Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feat: Add Index Read/Write Values for Capacity and Target #43

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2021
Merged

Feat: Add Index Read/Write Values for Capacity and Target #43

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2021

Conversation

nitrocode
Copy link
Member

@nitrocode nitrocode commented Oct 26, 2021 •
edited by korenyoni
Loading

what

  • Add index read/write values for autoscaling capacity and target
  • If the index values aren't provided, the original values will be used in place via coalesce(index, original)

why

  • Separate read/write capacities for table vs index

references

@nitrocode nitrocode requested review from a team as code owners October 26, 2021 15:51
@nitrocode
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@korenyoni korenyoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 26, 2021
korenyoni
korenyoni approved these changes Oct 26, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@korenyoni korenyoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@korenyoni korenyoni changed the title Add index values Feat: Add Index Read/Write Values for Capacity and Target Oct 26, 2021
@nitrocode nitrocode merged commit 173a458 into master Oct 26, 2021
@nitrocode nitrocode deleted the index_values branch October 26, 2021 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@korenyoni korenyoni korenyoni approved these changes

@jamengual jamengual Awaiting requested review from jamengual jamengual was automatically assigned from cloudposse/contributors

@woz5999 woz5999 Awaiting requested review from woz5999 woz5999 was automatically assigned from cloudposse/contributors

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Different provisioned capacity for table and indexes
3 participants
@nitrocode @korenyoni @cloudpossebot