Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Client installation page is broken #5

Closed
AlistairDoswald opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Client installation page is broken #5

AlistairDoswald opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@AlistairDoswald
Copy link

Moving to the Client>Installation page for a WS-Fed Client will result in a clearly broken page with the template exposed instead of having a normal page from which the installation details may be obtained.

A workaround is available, as the necessary information can be obtain with the https://<address:port>/auth/realms/<Realm name>/protocol/<protocol type>/descriptor URL.

This should however be corrected so that the information can be obtained as for clients of the other protocols.

AlistairDoswald added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2017
Support for SAML 1.1 tokens

* Applies for WS-Fed for both WS-Fed clients (with Keycloak as STS/IDP) and WS-Fed identity providers (with Keycloak as identity broker).
* "Keycloak as STS/IDP" side of the code has been reviewed and been shown to work. There is a minor problem with  the installation template. An [issue](#5) has been opened for the problem.
* "Keycloak as Identity Broker" side of the WS-Fed code doesn't currently seem to be functioning correctly, but code analysis and tests indicate that the problem doesn't lie in the code introduced for the SAML 1.1 tokens. An [issue](#6) has been opened for the problem.
@yelhouti yelhouti self-assigned this Mar 8, 2018
@yelhouti
Copy link

The problem wasn't it the javascript but in the java code it is normally fixed now with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants