Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tau L1 2023 #1087
Tau L1 2023 #1087
Changes from all commits
9fc02fa
f301913
509ce67
ac63ddd
7d1408d
23e7756
dd376b2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just confirming this is a fix, which synchronises the Tau object definition to what's in the interface document?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Duchstf ,@EmyrClement, Elias from the GT here, we were just gazing over these "tau_rawid_t". We were wondering if this parameter has any unit, and how it is intended to be "cut" on?
We found this line:
cmssw/L1Trigger/Phase2L1ParticleFlow/plugins/L1NNTauProducer.cc
Line 290 in 7c2e09f
and were wondering if these two are related and if the conversion is correct?
Thanks in advance!
All the best Elias
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to add, that the in the menu we would want to select all taus with "passLooseNN()". Can you clarify this point too? Thank you @EmyrClement and @Duchstf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Duchstf this is my understanding, and you should confirm if it's correct:
passLooseNN()
is a bool and corresponds to NN score (which is between 0 and 1) is > 0.28l1ct:: hwRawId
, which is aap_uint<10>
, corresponds to NN score * 1024 (i.e. from 0->1024)l1gt:: isolation
corresponds tol1ct:: hwRawId
, and is also aap_uint<10>
So to apply
passLooseNN()
on the GT object, I think it'sl1gt::isolation > ~286
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Duchstf From your thumbs up, I think you agree with my suggestion. Can you also confirm that the
iso_t
->tau_rawid_t
is just a fix to synchronise with the GT format?