Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore site hooks support #63

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

Ignore site hooks support #63

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

This change allows to ignore some site specific hooks e.g. for releases where a fix to runtime env has been appied then there is no need to run the site specific hook to fix that issue.

This is useful for https://github.com/cms-sw/cms-common/blob/master/etc/scramrc/SCRAM/hooks/runtime/99-gsl-config.sh where gsl tool has been fixed for 14.0.X and there is no need to run this hook in 14.0.X release cycle

@cmsbuild
Copy link

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch SCRAMV3.

@aandvalenzuela, @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link

cmsbuild commented Jan 24, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

+externals

tested via cms-sw/cmssw-config#101

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit ce77da1 into SCRAMV3 Jan 24, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@cmsbuild
Copy link

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next SCRAMV3 IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the ignore-site-hooks-support branch September 24, 2024 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants