-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
automatic finding of edm and pure root nano branches #1872
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant (vlimant) for branch master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
Pull request #1872 was updated. |
Pull request #1872 was updated. |
@cmsbuild please test I was thinking of asking for extra workflows, but I don't think the bot would generate the baseline for them. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6c4b56/28795/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6c4b56/28800/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
those are not specific to this PR ; do we really have to go back to 5.3 ? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6c4b56/29154/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
is it newly broken or was it already broken? |
I have started a test in 5.3 in cms-sw/cmssw#40031 |
I see there in the tests from 12 days ago
so, it was broken in some way already |
indeed, https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_5_3_X_2022-11-06-0000+3600ef/54007/validateJR/validateJR.log the same compilation error is already there |
perhaps it's an excuse to not go back that far in older releases ;) |
10_6_X results look OK. |
@clacaputo @mandrenguyen |
this vlimant@fb036c7 solves the compilation error in 5.3, but it does not avoid the error coming from |
For 5.3.X, AutoLibraryLoader::enable() is used. We call both |
We can avoid |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
that vlimant@66019a2 works and can go in a subsequent PR |
+reconstruction @vlimant thanks a lot for taking care of it |
merging it now, @vlimant feel free to open a new PR for 5.3.X fixes |
thanks ! |
Thank you. |
as commented in #1866 (comment) the current script is not parsing the edm flat table automatically, and is not compatible with pure-root nano output.
this PR tries to address both issues.
I might include the matrix_RE change for the new nano workflows