-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update frontier client to version 2.10.2 #8550
Conversation
please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_13_2_X/master. @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
Pull request #8550 was updated. |
please test |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6842a8/33197/summary.html External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
please test |
Pull request #8550 was updated. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6842a8/33198/summary.html External BuildI found compilation error when building: Patch #0 (pacparser-python-fix): + patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file tests/runtests.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 26. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/runtests.py.rej error: Bad exit status from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.lC8l6g (%prep) RPM build errors: line 37: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: external+pacparser+1.4.2-c4fe22f0bf954054330d4d4924a20c92 Macro expanded in comment on line 350: %{pkginstroot}/${PYTHON3_LIB_SITE_PACKAGES} |
d51981f
to
1faa148
Compare
please test |
Pull request #8550 was updated. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6842a8/33199/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_13_2_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
This resolves #8549