-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LTO] Improve link time by using multiple process for linking #8840
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_14_0_X/master. @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
test parameters:
|
please test |
please test for CMSSW_14_0_CLANG_X |
This does silence the warning, but is there a way to check if the LTO step is actually running in parallel, using slots from the Make job server ? |
please test |
Yes @fwyzard , it does run in parallel e.g. I tested it to build big Simulation plugin and I see the processes like [a] at link time. so basically it generates a temp makefile and then call [a]
|
Nice. |
doc says that |
Mhm, in the description of the PR you've written (emphasis mine)
|
as scram uses gmake so for cmssw the gmake job server will be available but let me double check |
@fwyzard , right, so with existing build rules |
Pull request #8840 was updated. |
please test |
Some build timing on 16 core build nodes
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-223d81/36154/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+externals comparison differences are due to additional cms-sw/cmssw#43304 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
This should avoid the warnings like [a] and also it should use the GNU Make job server[b] to run multiple processes for at link step
[a]
[b]