Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated root to tip of branch v6-30-00-patches #9189

Conversation

iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for branch IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master.

@iarspider, @aandvalenzuela, @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 13, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

root 6.30 changes are root-project/root@dcf4d2a...8f594ff
@makortel @Dr15Jones, any objection on get these in 14.1.X default IBs (I see there are some thread safety related changes too) ?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39353/summary.html
COMMIT: 91aafb6
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-12-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/9189/39353/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@Dr15Jones
Copy link

@smuzaffar as long as our tests and RelVals pass, I don't have any objections.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

root 6.30 changes are root-project/root@dcf4d2a...8f594ff
@makortel @Dr15Jones, any objection on get these in 14.1.X default IBs (I see there are some thread safety related changes too) ?

Let's get them in. I see commits from root-project/root#15113, that are needed to address cms-sw/cmssw#33084, and root-project/root#15459, that was motivated by cms-sw/cmssw#44670.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39364/summary.html
COMMIT: 91aafb6
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/9189/39364/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 17 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 62 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3325996
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 971
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 72
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3324933
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 777.594 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12834.0,... ): 83.939 KiB HLT/EGM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12834.0,... ): 35.131 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12834.0,... ): 7.070 KiB HLT/Filters
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 6 / 46 workflows

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

PR DQM/reco comparison show a lot of differences

@Dr15Jones
Copy link

I believe differences when using threads is expected. Was the results of the non-thread case also problematic?

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

DQM/reco comparison is only run for non-threaded runs.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

Would it make sense to rerun the tests (without the threading, just to make sure)? The earlier tests did not show unexpected differences.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

sure I can re-run it once 11h00 IB is available. By the way #9189 (comment) are without threading

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39392/summary.html
COMMIT: 91aafb6
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/9189/39392/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 14 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3338976
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338947
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

sure I can re-run it once 11h00 IB is available. By the way #9189 (comment) are without threading

Right. There the comparison differences are in 12834.7 that are known to be spurious cms-sw/cmssw#39803

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

Last round of tests looks clean

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants