-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated root to tip of branch v6-30-00-patches #9189
Updated root to tip of branch v6-30-00-patches #9189
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for branch IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master. @iarspider, @aandvalenzuela, @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
cms-bot internal usage |
please test |
root 6.30 changes are root-project/root@dcf4d2a...8f594ff |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39353/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@smuzaffar as long as our tests and RelVals pass, I don't have any objections. |
Let's get them in. I see commits from root-project/root#15113, that are needed to address cms-sw/cmssw#33084, and root-project/root#15459, that was motivated by cms-sw/cmssw#44670. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39364/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
PR DQM/reco comparison show a lot of differences |
I believe differences when using threads is expected. Was the results of the non-thread case also problematic? |
DQM/reco comparison is only run for non-threaded runs. |
Would it make sense to rerun the tests (without the threading, just to make sure)? The earlier tests did not show unexpected differences. |
sure I can re-run it once 11h00 IB is available. By the way #9189 (comment) are without threading |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68e900/39392/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Right. There the comparison differences are in 12834.7 that are known to be spurious cms-sw/cmssw#39803 |
Last round of tests looks clean |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
No description provided.