-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
include hcalRecAlgos ES producer in cosmic workflow [84X] #17784
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_8_4_X. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalCalo/Configuration @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: db23b22 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50.log25202.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
@Dr15Jones it looks like we need some fix here from the framework side |
I don't think there is a "problem" to fix. |
On 3/7/17 2:53 AM, David Lange wrote:
I don't think there is a "problem" to fix.
Just to understand more clearly:
we will not allow reading 900pre4 files (830-equivalent)
in 84X releases.
Correct?
… —
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17784 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbgUv9xWsJ-t50sXZXaxYdZD-Ltotks5rjTcvgaJpZM4MTlTj>.
|
I don't think we should change the fwk to allow it, no (but that said, the short matrix ran when I built 840 and 840patch1, so perhaps the check is not as reliable as it should be:) )
anyway, 840 is a hack for mwgr2/3
… On Mar 7, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Slava Krutelyov ***@***.***> wrote:
On 3/7/17 2:53 AM, David Lange wrote:
> I don't think there is a "problem" to fix.
>
Just to understand more clearly:
we will not allow reading 900pre4 files (830-equivalent)
in 84X releases.
Correct?
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#17784 (comment)>, or
> mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbgUv9xWsJ-t50sXZXaxYdZD-Ltotks5rjTcvgaJpZM4MTlTj>.
>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_4_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). |
Backport of #17782