-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix SiStripCluster::size
return type
#36669
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36669/27723
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-968ef0/21701/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
test parameters:
Adding few more 11834.X workflows that we've seen crashes (#36336), and enabling threading to increase chances for the "lucky" 10th event. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-968ef0/21704/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-968ef0/21705/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Ok, the additional workflows did not end up in the threading test, and the NaN didn't appear there this time. |
I'm testing a recipe for reproducing the NAN and checking the PR, proposed in #36336 (comment) by @missirol |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals-INPUT RelVals-THREADING Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testMakeTrackValidationPlots had ERRORS RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-THREADING
Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
I think at least #36819 is required to pass tests in threading mode |
48fbd69
to
6eae2ee
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36669/28078
|
Pull request #36669 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
6eae2ee
to
9c97405
Compare
mmmh, I am not sure what happened here... gitHub decided to close the PR and I cannot re-open it... |
I have no clue what caused GitHub to close the PR, but after a force-push to a closed PR (as the GH shows the actions here) it is not possible to re-open it. I suggest to open a new PR. |
sigh... OK here it is: #36852. |
resolves #36336
resolves #35489
PR description:
Follow up on #35489, based on suggestion at #36336 (comment).
SiStripCluster
DF, useauto
for return types;PR validation:
cmssw
compiles.