Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECAL Phase 2 Development WF 28234.61 fix #36748
ECAL Phase 2 Development WF 28234.61 fix #36748
Changes from 5 commits
ae4e516
640cce3
fdd8816
76fc329
702edbe
bd1b840
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wild cards in the output commands should better get avoided, in order to avoid the proliferation of unwanted collections in the output files.
On the other hand I understand from #36748 (comment) that this is exactly what you want for it. Still, is the list of collections to be saved really unknown a priori? Cannot you add them one by one, even if you get a long list with it? Please check, and update with the explicit products if you think that you can also satisfy your needs as such.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sine this is a development modifier that should not be running in production it seemed to make the development process easier if all products from ECAL related modules (at least those having ecal in the name) are kept by default. It shows what is produced (and eventually should not be because it is e.g. for Phase 1) and what is missing. Since this WF is for ongoing development we do not know a priori what collections will be produced.