-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_4_X] Run3 GEMGeometryBuilder Run3 modifier and fix DQM GEM chambers #38694
[12_4_X] Run3 GEMGeometryBuilder Run3 modifier and fix DQM GEM chambers #38694
Conversation
backport of #38666 |
A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
type gem |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beam_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-mutracking_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-pixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
Pull request #38694 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beam_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-mutracking_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-pixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Test are now successful. |
Hi @francescobrivio, I think the fix of the GEM onlineDQM is well-propagated. Best regards, |
+geometry |
+dqm |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-84e70a/26973/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
PR description:
Backport of #38666 and #38908:
@hyunyong @jshlee @watson-ij @quark2 since we are very tight with times I took the liberty of opening the backport, it is a verbatim copy of @hyunyong's and @quark2's master PRs.
PR validation:
Code compiles
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backport of #38666 and #38908