[12_4_X] Fix rerecoCommon DQM sequence

[francescobrivio]

PR description:

Backport of #39934
This PR fixes the @rerecoCommon DQM sequence.

PR validation:

See master PR for the validation

Backport:

Backport of #39934

[francescobrivio]

backport of #39934

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Fix rerecoCommon DQM sequence #39934

[mmusich]

please test

• @francescobrivio do I understand correctly that the actual re-reco will have to use a new release including this fix?

[francescobrivio]

please test

* @francescobrivio do I understand correctly that the actual re-reco will have to use a new release including this fix?

Ciao Marco, I think it should be possible to pass the correct commands directly in the driver for the re-reco without the need to wait for a new release (?), but I let @jordan-martins and @cms-sw/dqm-l2 comment further on the exact plans for the rereco.

[mmusich]

in the driver for the re-reco

e.g. by using @common+@muon+@L1TMon+@hcal+@jetmet+@ecal+@egamma+@L1TMuon+@L1TEgamma+@ctpps instead of the @rerecoCommon shorthand in the DQM and HARVESTING steps?
Looks somewhat error prone...

[francescobrivio]

e.g. by using @common+@muon+@L1TMon+@hcal+@jetmet+@ecal+@egamma+@L1TMuon+@L1TEgamma+@ctpps instead of the @rerecoCommon shorthand in the DQM and HARVESTING steps? Looks somewhat error prone...

I agree, but i'm afraid that's the only solution unless we wait for a new 12_4_X release...

[mmusich]

we wait for a new 12_4_X release..

aren't we expecting anyway one around today to fix prompt and hlt (see #39903)?

[francescobrivio]

urgent

• to be included in next 12_4_X for the re-reco if possible

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5330a1/28699/summary.html
COMMIT: f31f711
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-10-31-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39939/28699/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3719758
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3719734
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[jordan-martins]

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 @cms-sw/orp-l2 please, sign this PR. We need to deploy the full reRECO and validation campaign. Thanks,
Jordan

[mmusich]

type bug-fix

[rvenditti]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 can you also sign the master branch PR ASAP? #39934

[perrotta]

+1