Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Muon MVA ID model and working points in MiniAOD and NanoAOD #41903

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

andrea21z
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

  • This PR includes the update of the Muon MVA ID working points in MiniAOD and NanoAOD for the latest training.

  • This training is the final and has been published in CMS-PAS-MUO-22-001.

  • Related PR: to include the new MVA model in data repository, in .onnx format -> Updating Muon MVA ID model cms-data/RecoMuon-MuonIdentification#9

PR validation:

  • We check the output of the new branch and Working Points running runTheMatrix and everything looks fine.
  • We execute the basic tests suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41903/35850

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @andrea21z for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)
  • PhysicsTools/PatAlgos (xpog, reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AlexDeMoor, @rappoccio, @gouskos, @jdolen, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @ahinzmann, @AnnikaStein, @schoef, @emilbols, @jdamgov, @mbluj, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @hatakeyamak, @gpetruc, @azotz, @mariadalfonso, @demuller, @andrzejnovak, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

type muon

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

enable nano

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the muon label Jun 12, 2023
@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

please test with cms-data/RecoMuon-MuonIdentification#9

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33092/summary.html
COMMIT: 01ab854
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41903/33092/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 250200.17DAS Error

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 105 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3190910
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2262
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3188626
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 4 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 18 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 12351
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 12305
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 11 files compared)
  • Checked 25 log files, 11 edm output root files, 12 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.438 2.438 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.46 5.49 -0.4% 2.107 2.116
2500.311 2.546 2.546 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.89 4.90 -0.1% 2.539 2.541
2500.312 2.491 2.491 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.09 5.06 +0.5% 2.521 2.525
2500.33 1.240 1.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.21 10.27 -0.6% 2.227 2.233
2500.331 1.604 1.603 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.45 5.41 +0.8% 2.416 2.418
2500.332 1.485 1.485 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 7.90 7.82 +1.0% 2.327 2.332
2500.401 2.153 2.153 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.53 5.49 +0.9% 1.970 1.965
2500.501 1.753 1.753 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.65 9.57 +0.8% 1.851 1.850
2500.511 1.145 1.145 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.46 4.49 -0.8% 2.167 2.170
2500.5111 1.503 1.503 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 3.93 3.95 -0.4% 2.245 2.251
2500.601 2.015 2.015 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.72 13.74 -0.1% 1.728 1.727

@andrea21z
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @clacaputo, it seems to have failed due to an 'input DAS' error, should I do something else?

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33241/summary.html
COMMIT: 01ab854
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41903/33241/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33241/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33241/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 85 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 112 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3196062
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 293
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 16
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3195731
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.6559999999999999 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -0.164 KiB L1T/L1TStage2uGT
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12434.0,... ): 0.492 KiB L1T/L1TStage2uGT
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.164 KiB L1T/L1TStage2uGT
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 21 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 15
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 15505
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 15454
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 14 files compared)
  • Checked 31 log files, 14 edm output root files, 15 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.0 2.436 2.436 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.39 5.22 +3.2% 2.108 2.046
2500.001 2.546 2.546 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.87 4.76 +2.4% 2.548 2.473
2500.002 2.491 2.491 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.04 4.89 +3.1% 2.535 2.465
2500.01 1.240 1.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.00 9.78 +2.2% 2.229 2.168
2500.011 1.604 1.603 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.37 5.30 +1.2% 2.427 2.339
2500.012 1.485 1.485 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 7.76 7.60 +2.1% 2.331 2.257
2500.1 2.163 2.163 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.41 5.40 +0.2% 1.982 1.978
2500.2 2.260 2.260 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 6.31 6.22 +1.5% 1.881 1.883
2500.21 1.145 1.145 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.44 4.39 +1.3% 2.181 2.153
2500.211 1.503 1.503 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 3.86 3.73 +3.4% 2.250 2.231
2500.3 1.998 1.998 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.65 13.15 +3.8% 1.685 1.689
2500.31 1.207 1.207 -0.000 ( -0.0% ) 21.39 20.19 +6.0% 2.094 2.056
2500.311 1.584 1.584 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 14.98 15.19 -1.4% 2.163 2.128
2500.4 1.998 1.998 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.67 13.12 +4.2% 1.693 1.690

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 6, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41903/36203

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 6, 2023

Pull request #41903 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 7, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33599/summary.html
COMMIT: 4443ff6
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-07-07-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41903/33599/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33599/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5036b/33599/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
136.897 step 2
140.025 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • You potentially added 17 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 50 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3193892
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 30
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3193840
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 8 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 21 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 15
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 15505
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 15454
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 14 files compared)
  • Checked 31 log files, 14 edm output root files, 15 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.0 2.443 2.443 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.35 5.46 -1.9% 2.047 2.081
2500.001 2.552 2.552 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.79 4.89 -2.1% 2.461 2.122
2500.002 2.497 2.497 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.97 5.06 -1.9% 2.464 2.134
2500.01 1.240 1.240 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.74 10.21 -4.6% 2.143 1.959
2500.011 1.604 1.604 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.26 5.40 -2.7% 2.288 1.998
2500.012 1.485 1.485 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 7.52 7.82 -3.9% 2.222 2.028
2500.1 2.168 2.169 -0.000 ( -0.0% ) 5.42 5.46 -0.7% 1.905 1.957
2500.2 2.271 2.271 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 6.35 6.34 +0.2% 1.796 1.837
2500.21 1.146 1.146 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.47 4.41 +1.3% 2.150 1.850
2500.211 1.504 1.504 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 3.92 3.90 +0.5% 2.122 1.945
2500.3 2.008 2.008 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.74 13.78 -0.3% 1.689 1.664
2500.31 1.209 1.209 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 21.43 21.95 -2.4% 2.062 2.086
2500.311 1.585 1.585 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 15.53 15.90 -2.3% 2.021 2.155
2500.4 2.008 2.008 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.81 13.78 +0.2% 1.694 1.683

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor

vlimant commented Jul 11, 2023

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants