Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking validation updates/improvements #46324

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor

@mmasciov mmasciov commented Oct 9, 2024

PR description:

This PR is aimed at updating/improving Multi-Track Validation in terms of style/readability and content.
In particular:

  • Line colors are set to the same colors as markers (instead of black), and labels are increased for timing plots.
  • Resolution plots are added per iteration, only for tracks byOriginalAlgo, to allow for more detailed studies.
  • For phase-2, default pseudorapidity range for efficiency plot is increased to |η|<3.5.
  • Cut on transverse impact parameter (TIP) is set to the same value for all efficiency plots (but efficiency vs TIP); previously, TIP cut was only updated for efficiency vs η.

FYI, @kskovpen

…are set to the same colors as markers, and labels are increased for timing plots
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmasciov commented Oct 9, 2024

type tracking

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @mmasciov for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Validation/RecoTrack (dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @felicepantaleo, @missirol, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @wmtford this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmasciov commented Oct 9, 2024

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2024

Pull request #46324 was updated. @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please check and sign again.

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmasciov commented Oct 9, 2024

@cmsbuild please test

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

@AdrianoDee, I have modified this PR to only add the resolution plots for trackingOnly workflows. FYI, @mandrenguyen

Very much appreciated @mmasciov.

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Of course, @cms-sw/dqm-l2 shall also resign eventually. Thanks in advance!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c52330/42196/summary.html
COMMIT: 04e97eb
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46324/42196/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 2024.1000012024.100001_RunJetMET02024C_10k/step1_dasquery.log
  • 2024.100001DAS Error

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mandrenguyen, @cms-sw/dqm-l2 (FYI: @AdrianoDee): the error seems to be fully unrelated with this PR, and the comment about the increase in memory was addressed. Can this PR be signed again by DQM, unhold (by Matthew) and eventually merged?
Thanks!

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c52330/42241/summary.html
COMMIT: 04e97eb
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-15-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46324/42241/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mandrenguyen, this should be ready to be unhold and merged. Thanks

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gentle ping to @cms-sw/dqm-l2 and @cms-sw/orp-l2

@antoniovagnerini
Copy link

+1

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

unhold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants