-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking validation updates/improvements #46324
Conversation
…are set to the same colors as markers, and labels are increased for timing plots
…ow for improved per-iteration optimization
cms-bot internal usage |
type tracking |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46324/42157 |
A new Pull Request was created by @mmasciov for master. It involves the following packages:
@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
…ciency in phase-2
cff618a
to
8668222
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46324/42158 |
Pull request #46324 was updated. @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
Very much appreciated @mmasciov. |
Of course, @cms-sw/dqm-l2 shall also resign eventually. Thanks in advance! |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@mandrenguyen, @cms-sw/dqm-l2 (FYI: @AdrianoDee): the error seems to be fully unrelated with this PR, and the comment about the increase in memory was addressed. Can this PR be signed again by DQM, unhold (by Matthew) and eventually merged? |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@mandrenguyen, this should be ready to be unhold and merged. Thanks |
Gentle ping to @cms-sw/dqm-l2 and @cms-sw/orp-l2 |
+1 |
unhold |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is aimed at updating/improving Multi-Track Validation in terms of style/readability and content.
In particular:
byOriginalAlgo
, to allow for more detailed studies.FYI, @kskovpen