-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add delayedStandAloneMuons to SA muon reco #5178
add delayedStandAloneMuons to SA muon reco #5178
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @jalimena for CMSSW_7_2_X. add delayedStandAloneMuons to SA muon reco It involves the following packages: RecoMuon/Configuration @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
Hi all, we have spotted a few things: 2.-As for the collection name, by interacting with Marco (in cc), it seems we could safely change the string "delayed" to "displaced" in the collection name, as it seems good also for in-time displaced muons, and it is clearer to everybody as said. Still for the moment we would prefer to keep the refitted STA muons, at least for a full RelVal cycle. 3.- the updated at vertex collection should NOT be made for this case, we forgot to set to "false" the proper parameter... 4.-I think we should save the segments in the seed (in the reco format), and then we could do the full validation also for the seeds (I was trying today...) please Juliette, could you take care of 1. and 2. ? For info, I have also been updating the muon validation to include the new muon collection. cheers |
Ok hopefully my new commit has correctly taken care of 1 and 2. For #4, I think Daniele did it for me some time ago when we thought it was necessary: Please let me know if there is any problem. |
Pull request #5178 was updated. @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
thanks Juliette, ok 1. and 2. |
Hi Juliette, yes, that is the code you need for item 4. You already used it in the past, so it's safe. I asked you to remove it because it wasn't strictly necessary without the ExhaustiveTracjectoryBuilder. But it can still come in handy for validation, so we'd better put it back in. As for item 3, the main thing is to add in Thanks, Daniele |
@deguio any issues concerning the validation part? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). |
…0904 add delayedStandAloneMuons to SA muon reco
The promised wf 202 (ttbar with PU): new modules run: new branches in the event: Branch Name | Average Compressed Size (Bytes/Event) new: TrajectorySeeds_displacedMuonSeeds__RECO. 1625.96 |
Adds displacedStandAloneMuons collection, intended to improve the pt bias for displaced muons reconstructed in the muon system only. Uses a combination of the cosmic seed and standalone trajectory building.