skims for 74

[franzoni]

• back port of skims DEFINITIONS from 75
• superceeds Backporting 74x #9867 , which can be closed
• rationalization of the skim matrix, intended to pass to T0 the PD => "skims to run" correspondence,
  in light of 2015 PD's , see https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physics-announcements/3385.html
• collection of skims requirements by DPG/POG/PAGs : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OicL4b3jFUXalsk92GM9qLbNNAVklAGb7bf1T5BwZrY/edit#gid=0
• more local test running, will get back in a few hours
• to follow suit: forward porting to 7_5 and 7_6
  relval tests, once this PR will have passed
  integration in the ralval matrix, together with miniAOD - unscheduled

[franzoni]

please test

[franzoni]

note: the relval matrix does not yet invoke any skims
=> the tests from the bot don't address the substance

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

skims for 74

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Skimming
DPGAnalysis/Skims

@cmsbuild, @srimanob, @boudoul, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: edf35db
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9897/5723/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9897/2610/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1