-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pravega 2022 annual review #1073
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Raúl Gracia <raul.gracia@emc.com>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Gracia <raul.gracia@emc.com>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Gracia <raul.gracia@emc.com>
Hi @amye, any chance this will get reviewed soon? I just got a reminder from the bot and I wonder what is the planned schedule to review this PR: pravega/pravega#7097 (comment) Thanks! |
July 18th is next scheduled annual review. |
Thanks @amye, is the |
Yep, expected behavior! Clomonitor is our new reminder tool for this. |
FYI: I will be reviewing this on behave of TAG Storage. |
On behave of TAG Storage: Pravega has demonstrated continued and ongoing progress toward the scope it has mandated in its annual review. It also has an appropriate project governance structure that follows CNCF guidelines. Pravega recognizes several outstanding items before they are ready for incubation:
Following are some suggested remediations that should be taken. Maintainers should reach out to TAG storage within 6 months to present an update on the remediations taken:
|
Dear @yasker, Thanks a lot for your feedback. We have worked in the last weeks to implement the suggested remediations to continue growing the project:
Please, let us know if these action items have addressed your comments. cc/ @fpj @tkaitchuck |
@mattfarina & @nikhita as Liaisons for TAG Storage, would you review/approve/merge? |
Marking this as complete, annual reviews are no longer a requirement for sandbox. |
Pravega annual review as per CNCF TOC guidelines.
Fixes pravega/pravega#7097