Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add coalton implicit progn #1347

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Add coalton implicit progn #1347

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

YarinHeffes
Copy link
Collaborator

@YarinHeffes YarinHeffes commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Alternative to #1334.

@YarinHeffes YarinHeffes marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 20:21
@YarinHeffes YarinHeffes force-pushed the add-coalton-implicit-progn branch from 367b0cb to c33143b Compare January 9, 2025 23:26
jbouwman
jbouwman approved these changes Jan 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jbouwman jbouwman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks solid to me.

ps. hi yarin!

@stylewarning stylewarning force-pushed the add-coalton-implicit-progn branch from fc77c07 to d9c9f21 Compare January 13, 2025 16:45
@stylewarning stylewarning enabled auto-merge (squash) January 13, 2025 16:46
@stylewarning stylewarning merged commit 99f2560 into coalton-lang:main Jan 13, 2025
25 checks passed
@YarinHeffes YarinHeffes mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Closed
@YarinHeffes YarinHeffes deleted the add-coalton-implicit-progn branch January 16, 2025 23:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jbouwman jbouwman jbouwman approved these changes

@stylewarning stylewarning stylewarning approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@YarinHeffes @stylewarning @jbouwman