Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image refresh for centos-10 #7362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cockpituous
Copy link
Contributor

@cockpituous cockpituous commented Jan 28, 2025

Image refresh for centos-10

  • image-refresh centos-10

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bot label Jan 28, 2025
@cockpituous cockpituous changed the title Image refresh for centos-10 WIP: 1b0a5655aa93: [no-test] Image refresh for centos-10 Jan 28, 2025
@cockpituous
Copy link
Contributor

cockpituous pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
@cockpituous cockpituous force-pushed the image-refresh-centos-10-20250128-225807 branch from ff4ef45 to c42e2a1 Compare January 28, 2025 22:58
@cockpituous cockpituous changed the title WIP: 1b0a5655aa93: [no-test] Image refresh for centos-10 Image refresh for centos-10 Jan 28, 2025
@cockpituous
Copy link
Contributor

@martinpitt
Copy link
Member

What now? That's the services image SNAFU all over again 🤯 log

But it succeeded in other PRs, so let's do one retry to compare.

@martinpitt
Copy link
Member

See cockpit-project/cockpit#21564 - I have a theory.

@martinpitt martinpitt force-pushed the image-refresh-centos-10-20250128-225807 branch from c42e2a1 to aaf8700 Compare January 30, 2025 08:27
@martinpitt
Copy link
Member

services image got fixed yesterday, rebased.

@jelly jelly merged commit bf8ae85 into main Jan 30, 2025
14 checks passed
@jelly jelly deleted the image-refresh-centos-10-20250128-225807 branch January 30, 2025 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants