-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
teamcity: failed test: TestReplicaReproposalWithNewLeaseIndexError #39739
Labels
C-test-failure
Broken test (automatically or manually discovered).
E-starter
Might be suitable for a starter project for new employees or team members.
O-robot
Originated from a bot.
Milestone
Comments
cockroach-teamcity
added
C-test-failure
Broken test (automatically or manually discovered).
O-robot
Originated from a bot.
labels
Aug 19, 2019
|
nvanbenschoten
added
the
E-starter
Might be suitable for a starter project for new employees or team members.
label
Aug 28, 2019
@irfansharif mind taking a look at this? |
Taking a look now. |
irfansharif
added a commit
to irfansharif/cockroach
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2019
Fixes cockroachdb#39739. When inserting a new command into the proposal buffer, we first reserve an index into the buffer's array. If we subsequently fail to insert the proposal, we should account for this during proposal registration. Additionally add `TestPropBufCnt` to test basic behaviour of the counter maintained by the proposal buffer. Release note: None
irfansharif
added a commit
to irfansharif/cockroach
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2019
Fixes cockroachdb#39739. When inserting a new command into the proposal buffer, we first reserve an index into the buffer's array. If we subsequently fail to insert the proposal, we should account for this during proposal registration. Additionally add `TestPropBufCnt` to test basic behaviour of the counter maintained by the proposal buffer. Release note: None
craig bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2019
40477: storage: Deflake TestReplicaReproposalWithNewLeaseIndexError r=irfansharif a=irfansharif Fixes #39739. When inserting a new command into the proposal buffer, we first reserve an index into the buffer's array and an offset from the buffer's base lease index. If we subsequently fail to insert the proposal, we should undo the index and offset reservation. When we error out in `(*propBuf).Insert`, if we don't undo the index reservation we expect a proposal at said index during consumption, but don't find one. Release note: None Co-authored-by: irfan sharif <irfanmahmoudsharif@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-test-failure
Broken test (automatically or manually discovered).
E-starter
Might be suitable for a starter project for new employees or team members.
O-robot
Originated from a bot.
The following tests appear to have failed on master (testrace): TestReplicaReproposalWithNewLeaseIndexError
You may want to check for open issues.
#1444709:
Please assign, take a look and update the issue accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: