Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

settings/cluster: introducing the 19.2 cluster version #41935

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2019

Conversation

andreimatei
Copy link
Contributor

This is not a backport; it's original work on the release-19.2 branch.
The corresponding work on master is #41931.

I've had to skip a test because it was validating that we've removed all
the versions introduced before 19.1, since they're now "always active".
Work to remove those versions is in progress on master.

Release note: None

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

This is not a backport; it's original work on the release-19.2 branch.
The corresponding work on master is cockroachdb#41931.

I've had to skip a test because it was validating that we've removed all
the versions introduced before 19.1, since they're now "always active".
Work to remove those versions is in progress on master.

Release note: None
Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @andreimatei and @bdarnell)


pkg/server/version_cluster_test.go, line 141 at r1 (raw file):

func prev(version roachpb.Version) roachpb.Version {
	if version.Unstable != 0 {
		return roachpb.Version{Major: version.Major, Minor: version.Minor}

Also, prev(19.1.4) should equal prev(19.1)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@andreimatei andreimatei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @bdarnell and @tbg)


pkg/server/version_cluster_test.go, line 141 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, tbg (Tobias Grieger) wrote…

Also, prev(19.1.4) should equal prev(19.1)

I didn't add that to the comment because it's covered by prev(2.1-5) == 2.1 (although perhaps not so obviously)

@andreimatei andreimatei merged commit bad8e55 into cockroachdb:release-19.2 Oct 28, 2019
@andreimatei andreimatei deleted the 19.2-version19.2 branch October 28, 2019 14:14
knz added a commit to knz/cockroach that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
Prior to this patch, the release note script would skip over
standalone commits (without a PR) when extracting release notes.
This was defective, as the git history does have a few example
standalone commits, with release note but without PR.

Additionally, the script now reports PRs that are missing release
notes *or only use 'Release note: none'*, which may indicate
that the engineer did not bother filling in a note despite the
presence of a user-facing change.

For example:

```
$ python3 scripts/release-notes.py \
    --from v19.2.0-beta.20190930 \
    --until provisional_201911080435_v19.2.0-rc.5
```

Outputs (snippet):

- Andrei Matei:
  - 2019-10-04 [cockroachdb#41303][cockroachdb#41303] [ca32e6f][ca32e6f] sql: remove dead code [NO RELEASE NOTE]
  - 2019-10-05 [cockroachdb#41307][cockroachdb#41307] [1c99165][1c99165] sql: fix various problematic uses of the txn in DistSQL flows (4 commits)
  - 2019-10-28 [cockroachdb#41935][cockroachdb#41935] [bad8e55][bad8e55] settings/cluster: introducing the 19.2 cluster version [NO RELEASE NOTE]

In this example, the first PR has no release note but does not deserve
one. The second has a release note. The third is marked with "Release
note: None" but **there should really have been a release note**: the
introduction of the major cluster version is an important user-facing
change and should be announced.

By highlighting the missing release notes in this way, the script
gives an opportunity to the doc writer(s) to find additional
user-facing changes that need to be documented.

[cockroachdb#41303]: cockroachdb#41303
[cockroachdb#41307]: cockroachdb#41307
[cockroachdb#41935]: cockroachdb#41935
[ca32e6f]: cockroachdb@ca32e6ff0
[1c99165]: cockroachdb@1c99165c3
[bad8e55]: cockroachdb@bad8e55bb

Release note: None
knz added a commit to knz/cockroach that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Prior to this patch, the release note script would skip over
standalone commits (without a PR) when extracting release notes.
This was defective, as the git history does have a few example
standalone commits, with release note but without PR.

Additionally, the script now reports PRs that are missing release
notes *or only use 'Release note: none'*, which may indicate
that the engineer did not bother filling in a note despite the
presence of a user-facing change.

For example:

```
$ python3 scripts/release-notes.py \
    --from v19.2.0-beta.20190930 \
    --until provisional_201911080435_v19.2.0-rc.5
```

Outputs (snippet):

- Andrei Matei:
  - 2019-10-04 [cockroachdb#41303][cockroachdb#41303] [ca32e6f][ca32e6f] sql: remove dead code [NO RELEASE NOTE]
  - 2019-10-05 [cockroachdb#41307][cockroachdb#41307] [1c99165][1c99165] sql: fix various problematic uses of the txn in DistSQL flows (4 commits)
  - 2019-10-28 [cockroachdb#41935][cockroachdb#41935] [bad8e55][bad8e55] settings/cluster: introducing the 19.2 cluster version [NO RELEASE NOTE]

In this example, the first PR has no release note but does not deserve
one. The second has a release note. The third is marked with "Release
note: None" but **there should really have been a release note**: the
introduction of the major cluster version is an important user-facing
change and should be announced.

By highlighting the missing release notes in this way, the script
gives an opportunity to the doc writer(s) to find additional
user-facing changes that need to be documented.

[cockroachdb#41303]: cockroachdb#41303
[cockroachdb#41307]: cockroachdb#41307
[cockroachdb#41935]: cockroachdb#41935
[ca32e6f]: cockroachdb@ca32e6ff0
[1c99165]: cockroachdb@1c99165c3
[bad8e55]: cockroachdb@bad8e55bb

Release note: None
knz added a commit to knz/cockroach that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Prior to this patch, the release note script would skip over
standalone commits (without a PR) when extracting release notes.
This was defective, as the git history does have a few example
standalone commits, with release note but without PR.

Additionally, the script now reports PRs that are missing release
notes *or only use 'Release note: none'*, which may indicate
that the engineer did not bother filling in a note despite the
presence of a user-facing change.

For example:

```
$ python3 scripts/release-notes.py \
    --from v19.2.0-beta.20190930 \
    --until provisional_201911080435_v19.2.0-rc.5
```

Outputs (snippet):

- Andrei Matei:
  - 2019-10-04 [cockroachdb#41303][cockroachdb#41303] [ca32e6f][ca32e6f] sql: remove dead code [NO RELEASE NOTE]
  - 2019-10-05 [cockroachdb#41307][cockroachdb#41307] [1c99165][1c99165] sql: fix various problematic uses of the txn in DistSQL flows (4 commits)
  - 2019-10-28 [cockroachdb#41935][cockroachdb#41935] [bad8e55][bad8e55] settings/cluster: introducing the 19.2 cluster version [NO RELEASE NOTE]

In this example, the first PR has no release note but does not deserve
one. The second has a release note. The third is marked with "Release
note: None" but **there should really have been a release note**: the
introduction of the major cluster version is an important user-facing
change and should be announced.

By highlighting the missing release notes in this way, the script
gives an opportunity to the doc writer(s) to find additional
user-facing changes that need to be documented.

[cockroachdb#41303]: cockroachdb#41303
[cockroachdb#41307]: cockroachdb#41307
[cockroachdb#41935]: cockroachdb#41935
[ca32e6f]: cockroachdb@ca32e6ff0
[1c99165]: cockroachdb@1c99165c3
[bad8e55]: cockroachdb@bad8e55bb

Release note: None
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants