Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

catalog: protobuf and cluster versioning for autostats table settings #79009

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

msirek
Copy link
Contributor

@msirek msirek commented Mar 30, 2022

This commit adds protobuf and cluster versioning needed for #78110

Release note: none

@msirek msirek requested review from ajwerner, postamar and a team March 30, 2022 00:12
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@ajwerner ajwerner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bazel flake on this PR was juicy. I got sniped: #79015.

I'm cool with this change. Thanks for going through the iterations on the details of using the fields.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @postamar)

Copy link
Collaborator

@rytaft rytaft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Do you want to add the backport-22.1 label?

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 2 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @postamar)

This commit adds protobuf and cluster versioning needed for cockroachdb#78110

Release note: none
@michae2
Copy link
Collaborator

michae2 commented Mar 30, 2022

While we're at it, can we preallocate another table descriptor field? 😬 #79025

Copy link
Contributor Author

@msirek msirek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TFTRs!

bors r+

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 2 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @postamar)

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Mar 30, 2022

Build succeeded:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants