Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.1: roachtest: use persistent disks for disk-stall tests #99870

Conversation

nicktrav
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a backport of #99747 to 22.1.


Currently, the disk-stall tests use local SSDs. When run on GCE VMs, a higher test flake rate is observed due to known issues with fsync latency for local SSDs.

Switch the test to use persistent disks instead.

Touches: #99372.

Release note: None.

Release justification: Test only.

Epic: CRDB-20293

Currently, the `disk-stall` tests use local SSDs. When run on GCE VMs, a
higher test flake rate is observed due to known issues with fsync
latency for local SSDs.

Switch the test to use persistent disks instead.

Touches: cockroachdb#99372.

Release note: None.
@nicktrav nicktrav requested review from jbowens and a team March 28, 2023 21:55
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Mar 28, 2023

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@jbowens jbowens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nicktrav
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TFTR!

@nicktrav nicktrav merged commit 36a422b into cockroachdb:release-22.1 Mar 29, 2023
@nicktrav nicktrav deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.1-99747 branch March 29, 2023 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants