Skip to content

Conversation

@machadoit
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 5, 2025 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds logging statements and comments to the analyze.go file for testing purposes, while also modifying error handling behavior by ignoring errors from file reading operations.

  • Adds two log statements (one marked as not covered, one as covered)
  • Removes error handling for os.ReadFile operation
  • Removes early return logic for files without extensions

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to read JSON languages configuration file: %w", err)
}
data, _ := os.ReadFile(jsonPath)
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error from os.ReadFile is being ignored using blank identifier. If the file read fails, data will be nil and the subsequent json.Unmarshal will fail with a less informative error. Restore proper error handling to provide clear feedback when file reading fails.

Suggested change
data, _ := os.ReadFile(jsonPath)
data, err := os.ReadFile(jsonPath)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to read JSON languages configuration file: %w", err)
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
// If tool has no extensions defined, assume it supports all files
if len(tool.Extensions) == 0 {
//This is just a comment
log.Printf("This is covereed")
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corrected spelling of 'covereed' to 'covered'.

Suggested change
log.Printf("This is covereed")
log.Printf("This is covered")

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.02% (target: -0.50%) 33.33% (target: 50.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (f961a76) 5736 1156 20.15%
Head commit (4aadceb) 5735 (-1) 1157 (+1) 20.17% (+0.02%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#180) 6 2 33.33%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants