-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove skill UUID #283
Remove skill UUID #283
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily enhancing the asset loading and management systems within a Bevy application. Key modifications include the introduction of a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets.rs (1)
9-12
: Consider using more generic type parameter names.The generic parameter
TSkill
suggests this trait is specific to skills, but it appears to be a general-purpose custom asset loader. This could limit its perceived reusability for other asset types.Consider renaming the type parameters for better clarity:
- fn register_custom_assets<TSkill, TDto>(&mut self) -> &mut Self + fn register_custom_assets<TAsset, TDto>(&mut self) -> &mut Self where - TSkill: Asset + LoadFrom<TDto> + Clone + Debug, + TAsset: Asset + LoadFrom<TDto> + Clone + Debug, for<'a> TDto: Deserialize<'a> + AssetFileExtensions + Sync + Send + 'static;This change would:
- Better reflect the generic nature of the trait
- Make it more obvious that this can be used for any custom asset type
- Align with the PR's goal of treating skills as standard assets
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets.rs (1)
13-16
: LGTM! Good improvement in type parameter naming.The renaming from
TSkill
toTAsset
is a positive change that:
- Makes the trait more generic and reusable
- Better reflects that this is a general-purpose asset registration mechanism
- Aligns with the architectural goal of treating skills as standard assets
This change supports a more maintainable asset management system by:
- Removing special-case handling of skills
- Enabling consistent path-based asset loading
- Making the codebase more modular and reusable
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets/app.rs (1)
13-22
: Add documentation to explain usage and requirements.The implementation looks solid and aligns well with the PR objective of treating skills as standard assets. However, it would benefit from documentation explaining:
- Purpose and typical use cases
- Requirements for
TAsset
andTDto
types- Example usage with a simple asset type
Add doc comments like this:
+/// Registers custom assets with their corresponding DTO types for loading. +/// +/// # Type Parameters +/// * `TAsset` - The asset type to register +/// * `TDto` - The DTO type used for deserializing the asset +/// +/// # Example +/// ```rust +/// use bevy::prelude::*; +/// +/// #[derive(Asset, Clone, Debug)] +/// struct CustomAsset { /* ... */ } +/// +/// #[derive(Deserialize)] +/// struct CustomDto { /* ... */ } +/// +/// impl LoadFrom<CustomDto> for CustomAsset { /* ... */ } +/// impl AssetFileExtensions for CustomDto { /* ... */ } +/// +/// app.register_custom_assets::<CustomAsset, CustomDto>(); +/// ``` impl RegisterCustomAssets for App {src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-70
: Great architectural improvement moving to asset-based skill management.This transition to treating skills as assets brings several benefits:
- Leverages Bevy's built-in asset management system
- Enables hot-reloading capabilities
- Provides better resource management and memory safety
- Simplifies skill loading and unloading
src/plugins/skills/src/skills/skill_data.rs (1)
Line range hint
15-23
: Consider adding documentation for the SkillData struct.The struct definition is clean and properly aligns with treating skills as standard assets. However, adding documentation would improve maintainability by explaining the purpose of each field and their relationships.
Consider adding documentation like this:
+/// Represents the serializable data structure for a skill asset. +/// This struct is used to load skill definitions from .skill files. #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)] pub(crate) struct SkillData { + /// The display name of the skill name: String, + /// The time required to cast this skill cast_time: DurationData, + /// Animation configuration for the skill animate: AnimateData, + /// Runtime behavior configuration behavior: RunSkillBehaviorData, + /// Set of item types that can use this skill is_usable_with: HashSet<SkillItemType>, + /// Optional path to the skill's icon asset icon: Option<Path>, }src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs (2)
21-24
: Excellent refactor to use Bevy's asset system.The change from direct
Skill
types toHandle<Skill>
aligns with Bevy's asset management patterns and the PR's objective to treat skills as standard assets. This modification:
- Improves resource management through Bevy's asset system
- Enables loading skills from files rather than using UUIDs
- Maintains type safety through Bevy's handle system
Consider documenting the following patterns in your team's guidelines:
- Use
Handle<T>
for all asset references- Load assets through Bevy's asset system
- Reference assets by path instead of UUID
Also applies to: 24-28
Asset system setup for skills needs implementation
The verification reveals missing critical asset system components for skills:
- No asset loader implementation for
Skill
type- No asset type registration in the plugin setup
- Missing error handling for asset loading events
- Undefined skill asset serialization format
While
asset_server.load()
is being used to load skills, the supporting infrastructure is not in place, which could lead to runtime failures.Required implementations:
- Asset loader implementation for
Skill
- Asset type registration in plugin setup
- Asset loading error handling system
- Proper serialization format definition
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
21-28
: Verify asset loading setup.Since skills are now treated as assets, ensure proper asset loading infrastructure is in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the asset system setup for skills # Test 1: Check if a custom asset loader for skills is registered echo "Checking for skill asset loader registration..." rg -l "impl AssetLoader for.*Skill" # Test 2: Check if asset loading error handling is implemented echo "Checking for asset loading error handling..." rg "LoadState|AssetEvent.*Skill" # Test 3: Verify skill file extension registration echo "Checking for skill file extension registration..." rg "add_asset::<Skill>|register_asset_reflect::<Skill>"Length of output: 1701
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for skill-related asset setup in a more comprehensive way # Check for skill asset registration in plugin setup echo "Checking for skill asset registration in plugin setup..." rg -A 5 "impl Plugin.*Skill|struct SkillPlugin" # Check for any asset loading related to skills echo "Checking for skill asset loading..." rg -A 3 "load.*Skill|Skill.*load" # Check for asset server usage with skills echo "Checking asset server usage with skills..." rg -A 3 "AssetServer.*Skill|asset_server.*skill" # Check for RON file handling for skills (common asset format in Bevy) echo "Checking for RON file handling..." fd -e ron --exec grep -l "Skill"Length of output: 2548
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for the skill_asset macro and asset registration # Check for skill_asset macro definition echo "Checking for skill_asset macro definition..." rg "macro_rules!.*skill_asset" # Check for asset registration in the plugin setup echo "Checking for asset type registration..." rg -A 5 "app.add_asset|app.register_asset_source|app.register_type::<Skill>" # Check for the Skill type definition and its serialization echo "Checking Skill type definition..." ast-grep --pattern 'struct Skill { $$$ }' # Check for asset loading error handling systems echo "Checking for asset loading systems..." rg -A 5 "fn.*system.*asset.*skill|AssetEvent<Skill>"Length of output: 562
src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs (2)
113-133
: LGTM! The macro implementation is solid but could be more robust.The macro successfully implements compile-time validation of skill assets, aligning well with the PR's objective of moving to path-based skill loading.
Consider these improvements:
- Make paths configurable through environment variables or build configuration
- Add validation for the skill name to ensure it contains only valid filename characters
- Use
std::path::PathBuf
for cross-platform path handlingExample implementation for path handling:
let asset_path = PathBuf::from("skills") .join(format!("{}.skill", literal.value())); let path = PathBuf::from("assets") .join(&asset_path);
125-127
: Enhance error messages with more context.The error message could be more helpful by including the attempted path and suggesting possible solutions.
- compile_error!("No skill with that name found in `assets/skills/`") + compile_error!(concat!( + "Skill file not found: `", #path, "`\n", + "Make sure the skill file exists in the assets/skills directory ", + "and has a .skill extension" + ))src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs (1)
60-61
: Maintain consistency in type annotations.Most test cases use type inference, but line 168 explicitly specifies
Inventory::<Handle<Skill>>
. Consider using the same pattern as other tests for consistency:- Inventory::<Handle<Skill>>::new([]), + Inventory::new([]),Also applies to: 79-79, 103-103, 115-115, 136-136, 148-148, 168-168
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/equipped_items.rs (1)
Line range hint
94-163
: Consider reducing test data duplication.The test data setup could be simplified by extracting common test fixtures.
Consider creating helper functions:
fn create_test_skill_item(name: &str, item_type: SkillItemType) -> SkillItem { SkillItem { name, content: SkillItemContent::<Handle<Skill>> { item_type, ..default() }, } }src/plugins/skills/src/systems/visualize_slot_items.rs (1)
163-166
: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage maintainedThe slot initialization changes maintain good test coverage across various scenarios. Consider adding a test case for handling invalid asset handles to verify error handling behavior with the new asset-based approach.
Example test case to consider:
#[test] fn visualize_item_with_invalid_handle() { let mut app = setup(); let invalid_handle = Handle::<Skill>::default(); let item = SkillItem { content: SkillItemContent::<Handle<Skill>> { render: Renderer::default(), skill: invalid_handle, ..default() }, ..default() }; // Test visualization behavior with invalid handle }Also applies to: 185-196, 214-214
src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs (2)
Line range hint
33-39
: Consider enhancing error handling for skill handle retrieval.While the implementation is correct, consider making the error cases more explicit by returning a
Result
instead ofOption
. This would help distinguish between "slot not found" and "skill not set" cases.-impl GetRef<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>> for Slots { - fn get(&self, key: &SlotKey) -> Option<&Handle<Skill>> { - let item: &SkillItem = self.get(key)?; - item.content.skill.as_ref() - } +impl GetRef<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>> for Slots { + fn get(&self, key: &SlotKey) -> Result<Option<&Handle<Skill>>, SlotError> { + let item = self.get(key).ok_or(SlotError::SlotNotFound)?; + Ok(item.content.skill.as_ref()) + } +} + +#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)] +pub enum SlotError { + #[error("slot not found")] + SlotNotFound, +}
138-154
: Consider adding more edge cases to handle-based skill tests.While the basic handle retrieval test is good, consider adding tests for:
- Retrieving a handle from an empty slot
- Retrieving a handle from a slot with an item but no skill
- Clone behavior of handles in slots
Example test case:
#[test] fn get_skill_handle_from_empty_slot() { let slots = Slots::<Handle<Skill>>::default(); assert_eq!(None, slots.get(&SlotKey::BottomHand(Side::Right))); }src/plugins/skills/src/systems/equip.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-106
: Add documentation to explain the system's purpose and requirements.Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The purpose of the
equip_item
system- The relationship between
Slots
,SkillItem
, andHandle<Skill>
- Requirements for the generic type parameters
Example documentation:
/// System for equipping skill items into slots. /// /// # Type Parameters /// - `TContainer`: Component storing pending swap operations /// - `TInnerKey`: Inner key type for the swap controller /// - `TSwaps`: Component indicating active swap operations /// /// # Component Requirements /// - Entity must have `Slots<Handle<Skill>>`, `TContainer`, and `TSwaps` components pub fn equip_item<TContainer, TInnerKey, TSwaps>(...
Line range hint
152-309
: Consider organizing tests into sub-modules by functionality.The test cases cover different aspects of the system. Consider organizing them into sub-modules for better clarity:
#[cfg(test)] mod tests { // ... test setup code ... mod slot_operations { #[test] fn set_swap_in_item() { ... } #[test] fn set_swap_out_item() { ... } } mod error_handling { #[test] fn try_again_error_when_slot_not_found() { ... } #[test] fn return_error_when_slot_not_found() { ... } } mod cleanup { #[test] fn remove_swap_component_when_empty() { ... } #[test] fn do_not_remove_swap_component_when_not_empty() { ... } } }src/plugins/menu/src/systems/dropdown/insert_skill_select_dropdown.rs (1)
43-57
: Consider optimizing duplicate detection.The current implementation uses
Vec::contains
for duplicate detection which has O(n) complexity, making the overall filtering O(n²). Consider using aHashSet
for O(1) duplicate checking:- let mut seen = Vec::new(); + let mut seen = HashSet::new(); let skills = skills .iter() .filter(|(_, skill)| { if !skill.is_usable_with.contains(&item.content.item_type) { return false; } - if seen.contains(skill) { + if !seen.insert(skill) { return false; } - - seen.push(skill); true })src/plugins/menu/src/systems/update_panels/get_quickbar_icons.rs (1)
145-157
: Consider extracting test data setup into helper functions.While the test setup is functional, consider extracting the skill asset creation logic into a separate helper function to improve test maintainability and reusability. This would make it easier to create different test scenarios and reduce duplication across tests.
Example refactor:
fn create_test_skill(assets: &mut Assets<Skill>, icon: Option<Handle<Image>>) -> Handle<Skill> { let handle = new_handle(); assets.insert( handle.id(), Skill { icon, ..default() }, ); handle }Also applies to: 175-190
src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs (2)
13-21
: Simplify lifetime annotations in theread
functionThe explicit lifetime annotations in the
read
function can be omitted for cleaner code since Rust's lifetime elision rules can infer them.Apply this diff to simplify the function:
- async fn read<'a>( - reader: &'a mut Reader<'_>, - buffer: &'a mut Vec<u8>, - ) -> Result<&'a str, ReadError> { + async fn read( + reader: &mut Reader<'_>, + buffer: &mut Vec<u8>, + ) -> Result<&str, ReadError> { reader.read_to_end(buffer).await.map_err(ReadError::IO)?; from_utf8(buffer).map_err(ReadError::ParseChars) }
44-62
: Simplify error handling in theload
function using the?
operatorThe error handling logic can be made more concise by leveraging the
?
operator to propagate errors, enhancing readability.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
let buffer = &mut vec![]; - let dto = match Self::read(reader, buffer).await { - Err(ReadError::IO(err)) => return Err(LoadError::IO(err)), - Err(ReadError::ParseChars(err)) => return Err(LoadError::ParseChars(err)), - Ok(str) => serde_json::from_str(str), - }; - - match dto { - Ok(dto) => Ok(TAsset::load_from(dto, context)), - Err(err) => Err(LoadError::ParseObject(err)), - } + let str = Self::read(reader, buffer).await.map_err(|e| match e { + ReadError::IO(err) => LoadError::IO(err), + ReadError::ParseChars(err) => LoadError::ParseChars(err), + })?; + let dto: TDto = serde_json::from_str(str).map_err(LoadError::ParseObject)?; + Ok(TAsset::load_from(dto, context))Explanation:
- Use
map_err
with the?
operator to handle errors fromSelf::read
.- Apply the same pattern to handle errors from
serde_json::from_str
.- Return the final result directly, reducing nested control flow.
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs (4)
102-104
: Refactor to reduce duplication inequip_item
system callsThe
equip_item
system is registered twice with similar type parameters, differing only in the order ofInventoryKey
andSlotKey
. Consider creating a more generic implementation or combining these calls to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.You could define a helper function or generic system that abstracts over the key types.
154-154
: Unnecessary use ofas_ref()
onAssetServer
The
AssetServer
resource implementsDeref
, so you can use it directly without callingas_ref()
. Removingas_ref()
simplifies the code.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- let asset_server = asset_server.as_ref();
And use
asset_server
directly in subsequent calls.
184-184
: Refactor to reduce duplication when loading skill assets inget_loadout
Multiple
SkillItem
instances load the same skill assets usingasset_server.load(skill_asset!(...))
. To reduce repetition and improve performance, consider loading each unique skill asset once and reusing theHandle<Skill>
.Refactor example:
// At the beginning of `get_loadout` let shoot_hand_gun_skill = asset_server.load(skill_asset!("shoot_hand_gun")); let force_shield_skill = asset_server.load(skill_asset!("force_shield")); // In your SkillItems skill: Some(shoot_hand_gun_skill.clone()), skill: Some(force_shield_skill.clone()),Also applies to: 198-198, 212-212, 226-226
243-243
: Refactor to reduce duplication when loading skill assets inget_inventory
Similar to
get_loadout
, multipleSkillItem
instances inget_inventory
load the"shoot_hand_gun"
asset. Load this asset once and reuse the handle to avoid redundancy.Refactor example:
// At the beginning of `get_inventory` let shoot_hand_gun_skill = asset_server.load(skill_asset!("shoot_hand_gun")); // In your SkillItems skill: Some(shoot_hand_gun_skill.clone()),Also applies to: 254-254, 265-265
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets/app.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets/app.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/macros/Cargo.toml
(1 hunks)src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/dropdown/insert_skill_select_dropdown.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/equipped_items.rs
(5 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs
(8 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/update_panels/get_quickbar_icons.rs
(13 hunks)src/plugins/skills/Cargo.toml
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs
(3 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs
(6 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs
(11 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/skills.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/skills/skill_data.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/enqueue.rs
(8 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/equip.rs
(7 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/uuid_to_skill.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/visualize_slot_items.rs
(6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/plugins/skills/src/skills.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems/uuid_to_skill.rs
🔇 Additional comments (66)
src/plugins/macros/Cargo.toml (2)
10-11
: Verify quote compatibility with syn 2.0.
While syn has been updated to 2.0, quote remains at 1.0. Let's verify that this combination is supported.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues between syn 2.0 and quote 1.0
# Test: Look for patterns where syn and quote are used together
rg -A 3 'use quote|quote!'
10-10
: Verify proc macro compatibility with syn 2.0.
The update to syn 2.0 is appropriate, but as this is a major version bump, ensure all proc macros in this crate are compatible with the new version.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Proc macros are compatible with syn 2.0
The codebase uses straightforward syn features that are well-supported in syn 2.0:
- Basic parsing with
parse_macro_input
andparse
- Common types:
DeriveInput
,Data
,Fields
,Ident
,Type
,Lit
- Simple pattern matching on literals
- Integration with quote 1.0 for code generation
All these features have maintained compatibility in syn 2.0, and the usage patterns in the macros are standard and stable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with syn 2.0
# Test: Look for proc macro definitions that might need updates
ast-grep --pattern 'proc_macro'
# Test: Look for syn usage patterns that might need updates
rg -A 3 'use syn::|syn::'
Length of output: 3138
src/plugins/loading/src/traits.rs (1)
6-6
: LGTM! Well-organized module addition.
The new register_custom_assets
module is a good addition that aligns with the PR's objective of improving asset handling. It maintains good code organization by following the existing module naming pattern and alphabetical ordering.
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets.rs (3)
1-6
: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are minimal and purposeful, properly supporting the trait's requirements.
8-9
: LGTM! Clear and well-designed trait interface.
The trait provides a fluent interface for registering custom assets, with method chaining support via &mut self
return type.
10-12
: LGTM! Well-defined trait bounds.
The trait bounds are comprehensive and ensure:
- Type safety through Asset trait
- Custom loading behavior via LoadFrom
- Thread safety with Sync + Send
- Proper serialization support
src/plugins/skills/Cargo.toml (1)
18-18
: LGTM! Dependency change aligns with the new skill asset system.
The movement of macros
from dev-dependencies to main dependencies is appropriate, as it will be used for production code in the new skill asset loading system.
Let's verify the workspace setup:
✅ Verification successful
Workspace configuration and dependency change verified successfully
The change is correctly implemented:
macros
is properly referenced as a workspace dependency in the skills package- The workspace setup is valid with appropriate dependency management
- Moving
macros
to main dependencies aligns with its production use in the new skill asset system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the workspace configuration and macros dependency
# Test 1: Check if this is part of a workspace by looking for root Cargo.toml
echo "Checking workspace setup..."
if ! [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
echo "Error: No root Cargo.toml found"
exit 1
fi
# Test 2: Verify macros package exists in workspace
echo "Verifying macros package..."
rg -l "name = \"macros\"" "src/plugins/macros/Cargo.toml"
Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the workspace configuration in detail
# Check if macros is properly defined in workspace members
echo "=== Checking workspace members ==="
rg "members.*plugins.*macros" Cargo.toml
# Verify macros package version in workspace dependencies
echo -e "\n=== Checking workspace dependencies ==="
rg "^\[workspace\.dependencies\]" -A 10 Cargo.toml
# Check the actual macros dependency in skills Cargo.toml
echo -e "\n=== Checking skills package dependency ==="
cat src/plugins/skills/Cargo.toml
Length of output: 1101
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets/app.rs (2)
1-11
: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly organized and provide all necessary components for the custom asset registration implementation.
19-21
: Verify error handling in asset initialization.
The implementation chains init_asset
and register_asset_loader
without explicit error handling. Let's verify how errors are handled in the underlying Bevy system.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly implemented in the asset loading system
The implementation has comprehensive error handling:
-
CustomAssetLoader
implements proper error handling through theLoadError
type which handles:- IO errors during file reading
- Character parsing errors for UTF-8 content
- JSON parsing errors for the asset data
-
The chained methods work as expected:
init_asset
is a Bevy framework method that sets up the asset typeregister_asset_loader
adds the loader with proper error propagation- Errors are properly propagated through the Result type in the loader's implementation
The error handling implementation is thorough and follows Bevy's asset system design patterns, making the original concern unwarranted.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for error handling patterns in Bevy's asset initialization
# and registration to understand the default behavior
# Look for error handling in Bevy's AssetApp trait implementation
rg -A 5 "init_asset.*where"
# Look for error handling in CustomAssetLoader implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'impl AssetLoader for CustomAssetLoader<$_, $_> {
$$$
fn load($_, $_, $_, $_) -> $_ {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the implementation and usage patterns more broadly
# Search for init_asset implementation
rg -A 10 "fn init_asset"
# Search for CustomAssetLoader implementation
rg -A 15 "impl.*CustomAssetLoader"
# Search for register_asset_loader implementation
rg -A 10 "fn register_asset_loader"
# Look for any Result or error handling patterns in related files
rg -A 5 "Result|Error" src/plugins/loading/
Length of output: 23888
src/plugins/loading/src/lib.rs (1)
5-5
: LGTM! The new module declaration aligns with the PR objectives.
The addition of the asset_loader
module with crate-level visibility is well-structured and supports the transition to treating skills as standard assets.
Let's verify the integration of the new asset loader:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how the new asset loader is being used.
Let me check one final aspect to understand how the new CustomAssetLoader is integrated with skills.
The new asset_loader
module is well-implemented and properly integrated
The verification shows that:
- The
CustomAssetLoader
follows the same pattern asFolderAssetLoader
with proper implementation ofAssetLoader
trait - It's correctly used through the
register_custom_assets
trait for loading assets including skills - The implementation is generic and type-safe, using
TAsset
andTDto
to handle various asset types - The module's crate-level visibility is appropriate as it's used internally by the loading plugin
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the new asset_loader module
# Test 1: Check if the asset_loader module is properly implemented
echo "Checking asset_loader implementation..."
rg -p "impl.*AssetLoader" src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs
# Test 2: Verify that the new asset loader is used for skills
echo "Checking skill asset loading usage..."
rg -p "CustomAssetLoader.*skill" .
# Test 3: Compare with folder_asset_loader to ensure consistent patterns
echo "Comparing with folder_asset_loader..."
rg -p "impl.*AssetLoader" src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs
Length of output: 826
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details and usage of CustomAssetLoader
echo "Checking CustomAssetLoader implementation and usage..."
rg -p "use.*CustomAssetLoader|struct.*CustomAssetLoader" .
# Check how the asset loader is registered in the plugin
echo "Checking asset loader registration..."
rg -p "app\.add_asset_loader|register_asset_loader" .
# Look for skill-related asset type definitions
echo "Checking skill asset type definitions..."
rg -p "struct.*Skill|enum.*Skill" .
Length of output: 5060
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the registration of skill assets
echo "Checking skill asset registration..."
rg -p "RegisterCustomAssets.*Skill|register_custom_assets.*Skill" .
# Check the asset_loader.rs file content
echo "Checking asset_loader.rs content..."
cat src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs
# Check the plugin setup
echo "Checking LoadingPlugin setup..."
cat src/plugins/loading/src/lib.rs
Length of output: 3156
src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs (3)
3-3
: LGTM: Import changes align with the PR objective.
The new imports support the transition to handling skills as standard assets.
Also applies to: 11-11
35-35
: LGTM: Proper implementation of Bevy asset handling.
The transition to Handle<Skill>
is the correct approach for handling skills as assets in Bevy. This change:
- Ensures proper asset lifecycle management
- Maintains type safety
- Aligns with Bevy's asset handling patterns
Also applies to: 41-41
20-20
: Verify the impact of removing with_predefined_combos
.
The type change from ComboNode<SkillId>
to Combos
aligns with treating skills as assets. However, let's verify that the removal of with_predefined_combos
doesn't break existing code.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of with_predefined_combos
is safe
The codebase only uses ComboBundle::with_timeout()
for initialization, as seen in src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs
. The removed with_predefined_combos
method was not used anywhere, making its removal safe. The type change from ComboNode<SkillId>
to Combos
is properly supported by the remaining initialization pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining usage of the removed method
# Expect: No results, as the method should not be used anymore
# Test: Search for direct method calls
rg "with_predefined_combos"
# Test: Search for ComboBundle initialization patterns that might have used this method
ast-grep --pattern 'ComboBundle { $$$'
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the usage patterns of ComboBundle
# Search for ComboBundle usage patterns
rg "ComboBundle" -A 3
# Search for any test files that might use ComboBundle
fd "test.*\.rs" --exec rg "ComboBundle" -A 3 {}
# Look for any struct definitions or implementations related to ComboBundle
ast-grep --pattern 'struct ComboBundle'
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $$ for ComboBundle'
Length of output: 1262
src/plugins/skills/src/skills/skill_data.rs (3)
Line range hint 5-13
: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured and align well with the transition to treating skills as standard assets.
Line range hint 25-29
: LGTM! Proper asset file extension configuration.
The implementation correctly specifies the .skill
extension, supporting the transition to file-based skill assets.
Line range hint 31-45
: Consider adding error handling for asset loading.
While the implementation is correct, it might benefit from more robust error handling for asset loading failures.
Let's verify how asset loading errors are handled in the codebase:
Consider wrapping the asset loading in a Result to handle potential failures:
impl LoadFrom<SkillData> for Skill {
fn load_from<TLoadAsset: LoadAsset>(
skill_data: SkillData,
asset_server: &mut TLoadAsset,
- ) -> Self {
+ ) -> Result<Self, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
+ let icon = if let Some(icon_path) = skill_data.icon {
+ Some(asset_server.load_asset(icon_path))
+ } else {
+ None
+ };
+
Self {
name: skill_data.name,
cast_time: Duration::from(skill_data.cast_time),
animate: skill_data.animate.into(),
behavior: skill_data.behavior.into(),
is_usable_with: skill_data.is_usable_with,
- icon: skill_data.icon.map(|icon| asset_server.load_asset(icon)),
+ icon,
}
}
}
src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs (1)
12-12
: LGTM: Required import for Bevy's handle types.
The addition of Bevy's prelude import is necessary for using Handle<T>
type.
src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs (2)
57-58
: LGTM: Asset loading conditions are properly handled.
The addition of checks for both AssetLoadProgress
and DependencyResolveProgress
ensures that visualization commands only run when all assets are fully loaded and dependencies are resolved. This is essential for treating skills as standard assets.
60-60
: Verify if sequential execution is necessary.
Adding .chain()
forces the systems to run sequentially instead of in parallel. While this might be necessary for dependency ordering, it could impact performance.
Let's check if there are any explicit dependencies between these systems:
If there are no explicit dependencies between these systems, consider removing .chain()
to allow parallel execution for better performance.
✅ Verification successful
Sequential execution appears necessary for dependency handling
The .chain()
usage is justified here because:
- The systems are running in the
Update
stage and involve asset loading and dependency resolution - The second system (
VisualizeCommands::apply
) explicitly runs with conditions checkingDependencyResolveProgress
- The sequential ordering ensures that visualization tracking is completed before commands are applied, which is important for dependency resolution
The performance impact of sequential execution is an acceptable trade-off for maintaining correct dependency handling in this case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for system dependencies or shared component access that would require sequential execution
# Search for component access patterns in the Visualizer and VisualizeCommands implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'impl Visualizer<$_, $_> {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'impl VisualizeCommands<$_, $_> {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the systems and their dependencies
# First, let's find the context around where .chain() is used
rg -B 10 -A 5 "\.chain\(\)" src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
# Also search for any system definitions or app.add_systems calls
rg "add_systems|fn \w+_system" src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
Length of output: 550
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for the implementation of these systems to understand their dependencies
# Search for Visualizer's track_in_self_and_children implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn track_in_self_and_children<$_>($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for VisualizeCommands::apply implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn apply($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for any shared component access or dependencies
rg "Query|ResMut|Res" src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
Length of output: 361
src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets/app.rs (2)
16-17
: LGTM: New imports support asset registration changes.
The added imports for RegisterCustomAssets
and RegisterLoadTracking
align well with the PR's objective of standardizing asset handling.
36-39
: LGTM: Enhanced asset registration system.
The changes improve asset handling by:
- Using
register_custom_assets
for more sophisticated asset registration with DTO support - Implementing
AliveAssets<TAsset>
for better asset lifecycle management
Let's verify the integration of these changes:
✅ Verification successful
Changes are consistent with the codebase implementation
The verification confirms:
RegisterCustomAssets
trait is properly implemented forApp
with consistent DTO support and asset loading patternsAliveAssets<TAsset>
is well-integrated across the codebase:- Defined as a resource with proper HashSet implementation
- Used consistently in load tracking and folder asset registration
- Integrated with systems for mapping load results
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of RegisterCustomAssets trait and AliveAssets
# across the codebase to ensure consistent implementation
# Check for other implementations of RegisterCustomAssets
echo "Checking RegisterCustomAssets implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl RegisterCustomAssets for $TYPE {
$$$
}'
# Look for AliveAssets usage patterns
echo "Checking AliveAssets usage patterns..."
rg "AliveAssets<.*>" -A 3
Length of output: 3781
src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs (1)
113-133
: Verify the macro usage and directory structure.
Let's ensure the codebase is prepared for this change.
✅ Verification successful
Macro implementation aligns with codebase usage and directory structure
The verification confirms:
- The
assets/skills
directory exists with.skill
files - All skill files referenced in macro usages (
shoot_hand_gun.skill
,force_shield.skill
) are present in the directory - The macro is used consistently in
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs
for loading skill assets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the macro usage and directory structure
# Test 1: Check if the skills directory exists
if [ ! -d "assets/skills" ]; then
echo "Warning: assets/skills directory does not exist"
fi
# Test 2: Find all .skill files
echo "Existing skill files:"
fd -e skill . assets/skills
# Test 3: Find usage of the skill_asset macro
echo "Macro usage:"
rg "skill_asset!\(" -A 2
Length of output: 1749
src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs (1)
Line range hint 1-138
: LGTM! Well-structured asset loading implementation.
The implementation provides a robust error handling system that aligns well with the PR objective of treating skills as standard assets. The code is well-organized and follows Rust best practices.
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs (3)
9-9
: LGTM! Import changes align with asset-based skill handling.
The changes to use a generic Inventory
type and add Handle
support are consistent with treating skills as standard assets.
Also applies to: 14-14, 49-52
Line range hint 18-45
: LGTM! System implementation remains robust with generic inventory.
The core swap functionality is preserved while benefiting from the more flexible inventory type.
Line range hint 1-180
: Verify consistent adoption of asset-based skill handling.
Let's ensure all inventory usages have been updated to use the new pattern consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a final response:
Asset-based skill handling has been consistently implemented.
The codebase shows consistent usage of Handle<Skill>
across all inventory-related components and systems:
- The base type definition
Inventory<TSkill = Handle<Skill>>
correctly defaults to usingHandle<Skill>
- All test cases and implementations consistently use
Handle<Skill>
when instantiatingSkillItem
andInventory
- No instances of direct
Skill
usage were found in inventory contexts - The type system enforces this pattern through generic constraints and default type parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of Inventory<Skill> or inconsistent patterns
# Test 1: Look for old Inventory<Skill> pattern
echo "Checking for old Inventory<Skill> pattern..."
rg "Inventory<Skill>"
# Test 2: Look for potential SkillItem usage without Handle
echo "Checking for SkillItem usage without Handle..."
rg "SkillItem(?!<Handle<Skill>)" --type rust
# Test 3: Verify all inventory-related tests follow the new pattern
echo "Checking inventory test patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $test_name() {
$$$
Inventory::<$type>::new($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 679
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach with simpler patterns
# Check for SkillItem usage patterns
echo "Checking SkillItem usage patterns..."
rg "SkillItem" -A 2 --type rust
# Check Inventory type declarations and usages
echo "Checking Inventory type declarations and usages..."
rg "Inventory::" --type rust
# Look for skill-related type parameters
echo "Checking skill-related generic type parameters..."
rg "Inventory<" --type rust
Length of output: 54925
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/equipped_items.rs (3)
Line range hint 1-93
: LGTM! Main implementation is type-safe and robust.
The system implementation correctly handles the type changes while maintaining its core functionality. The error handling and cleanup processes are well-implemented.
Line range hint 94-114
: LGTM! Type changes are consistent with asset-based approach.
The update to use Handle<Skill>
aligns with treating skills as standard assets.
Line range hint 1-207
: Verify complete migration from UUID to asset-based skill identification.
The changes look good, but let's verify that no UUID-based skill identification remains in related files.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the context of those UUID references to ensure they're not problematic.
No issues found - UUID usage is only in test fixtures
The UUID references found are exclusively in test code where they're used to create deterministic test handles. The actual implementation correctly uses Bevy's asset system with Handle<Skill>
. The migration from UUID to asset-based skill identification is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining UUID references in skill-related files
rg -i "uuid.*skill|skill.*uuid" --type rust
# Search for old Skill type usage without Handle
ast-grep --pattern 'Slots::<Skill>'
ast-grep --pattern 'SkillItemContent::<Skill>'
Length of output: 474
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get context around the UUID references
rg -B 5 -A 5 "uuid.*skill|skill.*uuid" --type rust
# Check if these are test fixtures
fd "get_quickbar_icons" -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 9537
src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs (3)
4-4
: LGTM: Import changes align with asset-based skill handling.
The addition of skills::Skill
and bevy::prelude::*
imports supports the transition to treating skills as Bevy assets.
Also applies to: 7-7
Line range hint 15-201
: LGTM: Robust implementation with comprehensive test coverage.
The existing implementation is well-designed:
- Type-generic implementations ensure compatibility with the new
Handle<Skill>
type - Comprehensive test coverage using mock types validates the behavior
- No implementation changes were needed, demonstrating good initial design
13-13
: Verify the impact of the default type parameter change.
The modification to use Handle<Skill>
as the default type parameter aligns with the PR objective of treating skills as assets. However, we should verify that all existing inventory usages are compatible with this change.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The default type parameter change is safe and all usages are compatible
All existing usages of Inventory
in the codebase are either:
- Using the default type parameter implicitly
- Explicitly using
Handle<Skill>
as the type parameter - Part of generic implementations that are type-agnostic
The change aligns perfectly with the existing codebase, particularly evident in:
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs
whereInventory
is explicitly used withHandle<Skill>
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs
where the type is used asInventory<Handle<Skill>>
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct Inventory type usage to ensure compatibility with new default type parameter
# Test 1: Look for explicit Inventory type usage that might need adjustment
rg "Inventory<" --type rust
# Test 2: Look for inventory instantiation patterns
rg "Inventory::new" --type rust -A 2
Length of output: 2931
src/plugins/skills/src/systems/visualize_slot_items.rs (3)
84-85
: LGTM: Type parameter simplification
The removal of explicit type parameter Slots::<Skill>::new
in favor of Slots::new
is a good simplification that aligns with treating skills as standard assets. The type inference works correctly here.
128-131
: LGTM: Consistent type parameter simplification
The simplification is consistently applied in the multi-item test case while maintaining comprehensive test coverage for multiple slot scenarios.
152-152
: Verify consistent Handle usage across the codebase
The change to SkillItemContent::<Handle<Skill>>
aligns with treating skills as assets. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied.
Also applies to: 188-188
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the SkillItemContent
type definition to understand if it's generic and how it's being used.
No issues found - type parameter usage is correct
The SkillItemContent
is already defined as a generic struct with a default type parameter Handle<Skill>
: struct SkillItemContent<TSkill = Handle<Skill>>
. The explicit type annotation in the reviewed code SkillItemContent::<Handle<Skill>>
is redundant but valid since it matches the default type parameter. The rest of the codebase mostly relies on the default type parameter, which is why we see many usages without explicit type annotation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct Skill usage that should be Handle<Skill>
rg "SkillItemContent[^<]" --type rust
# Search for the new pattern to confirm consistent usage
rg "SkillItemContent::<Handle<Skill>>" --type rust
Length of output: 6215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the definition of SkillItemContent
ast-grep --pattern 'struct SkillItemContent'
# Look for type parameters or where clauses
rg "SkillItemContent" -B2 -A2 --type rust src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs
Length of output: 969
src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs (3)
7-7
: LGTM! Import change aligns with Bevy conventions.
The switch to bevy::prelude::*
follows Bevy's recommended practices for importing common traits and types.
11-13
: Well-designed change to handle-based skill references!
The modification to use Handle<Skill>
as the default type parameter is a good architectural decision because:
- It aligns with Bevy's asset management system
- Handles are lightweight references, improving performance
- The generic type parameter maintains flexibility while providing a sensible default
12-12
: Verify consistent handle usage across the codebase.
Let's ensure that all skill references have been updated to use handles consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information to verify the handle usage consistency.
Handle usage is correctly implemented across the codebase
The codebase consistently uses Handle<Skill>
as the default type parameter in all relevant places:
- Default slot container:
Slots<TSkill = Handle<Skill>>
- Default inventory container:
Inventory<TSkill = Handle<Skill>>
- Default skill item:
SkillItem<TSkill = Handle<Skill>>
The direct Skill
usages found are appropriate as they are for:
- Asset type definitions
- Struct implementations
- Test code
- Internal type aliases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any direct Skill usage that should be Handle<Skill>
# Expect: All skill references should use Handle<Skill> except in asset definitions
# Search for direct Skill usage
rg --type rust "Skill[^<]" --glob "!**/asset*.rs"
# Search for Handle<Skill> usage to compare
rg --type rust "Handle<Skill>"
Length of output: 162376
src/plugins/skills/src/systems/equip.rs (1)
Line range hint 1-309
: Changes align well with PR objectives.
The transition from direct Skill
references to Handle<Skill>
aligns with the goal of treating skills as standard assets. The implementation:
- Properly uses Bevy's asset handling patterns
- Maintains existing functionality
- Includes comprehensive test coverage
src/plugins/menu/src/lib.rs (1)
277-277
: LGTM! Verify asset loading implementation.
The simplified type signature aligns with the PR objective to treat skills as standard assets. However, let's verify the asset loading implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the change to panel_container_states
. The code shows that Inventory
is a type alias defined in src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs
as:
pub type Inventory<TSkill = Handle<Skill>> = Collection<Option<SkillItem<TSkill>>>;
The change to remove the explicit <Skill>
type parameter is correct because:
- The type alias already has a default type parameter
Handle<Skill>
- The codebase consistently uses this default throughout (as seen in the test cases and implementations)
- The change aligns with treating skills as standard assets loaded via paths
The type simplification is safe and correct.
The asset loading is properly handled through the default type parameter and Bevy's asset system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Inventory type implementation and asset loading
# Look for the Inventory type definition and any asset loading related code
# Search for Inventory type definition
echo "=== Inventory Type Definition ==="
rg --type rust "struct Inventory" -A 5
# Search for asset loading implementations
echo "=== Asset Loading Implementation ==="
rg --type rust "impl.*AssetLoader.*Skill" -A 10
Length of output: 1545
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for Inventory type and related asset loading implementations with broader patterns
# Search for Inventory type and its implementation
echo "=== Inventory Type and Implementation ==="
rg --type rust "^(pub )?struct Inventory|^impl.*Inventory" -A 5
# Search for skill-related asset loading code with broader patterns
echo "=== Skill Asset Loading ==="
rg --type rust "(load|Load).*Skill|Skill.*[Aa]sset" -A 5
# Search for inventory-related systems and asset handling
echo "=== Inventory Systems and Asset Handling ==="
rg --type rust "fn.*inventory.*asset|system.*inventory.*asset" -A 5
Length of output: 9283
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the Inventory struct definition and its generic implementation
# Search for Inventory struct definition
echo "=== Inventory Struct Definition ==="
rg --type rust -p "struct Inventory\s*(<[^>]+>)?\s*\{" -A 10
# Search for the specific file where the change was made to understand the context better
echo "=== Context Around the Changed Line ==="
rg --type rust -p "panel_container_states.*Inventory" -B 5 -A 5 src/plugins/menu/src/lib.rs
# Look for skill item related types
echo "=== Skill Item Types ==="
rg --type rust "SkillItem|SkillItemContent" -A 5
Length of output: 86617
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/dropdown/insert_skill_select_dropdown.rs (2)
184-262
: LGTM! Well-structured test for skill deduplication.
The test effectively validates the deduplication functionality by:
- Setting up test data with duplicate skills
- Verifying that only unique skills appear in the dropdown
- Following consistent test patterns
Line range hint 1-262
: Verify alignment with PR objective of removing skill UUIDs.
While the deduplication changes are valuable, please verify how this file's changes contribute to the PR's main objective of treating skills as standard assets and removing UUIDs.
src/plugins/menu/src/systems/update_panels/get_quickbar_icons.rs (3)
Line range hint 21-34
: LGTM: Clean transition to asset-based skill handling.
The addition of the skills
resource and its integration into the system aligns well with the PR's objective of treating skills as standard assets. The changes maintain the system's core functionality while adopting a more standardized approach to asset management.
73-81
: LGTM: Robust asset retrieval implementation.
The helper function's adaptation to use asset handles is well-implemented, maintaining proper error handling through the Option chain and preserving lifetime constraints.
198-201
: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage maintained.
The test cases have been properly adapted to the new asset-based approach while maintaining thorough coverage of all scenarios. The modifications preserve the original behavioral verification while accommodating the new implementation.
Also applies to: 227-235, 250-253, 279-282, 305-308, 341-344, 377-378
src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs (2)
9-11
: Good use of PhantomData
for type safety
The phantom_data
field correctly utilizes PhantomData
to maintain type information without storing actual data.
31-39
: Trait bounds and implementations are appropriate
The implementation of the AssetLoader
trait with the specified associated types and trait bounds is correct and aligns with the requirements for custom asset loading in Bevy.
src/plugins/skills/src/systems/enqueue.rs (12)
7-9
: Add necessary imports for Assets
and Handle
The addition of Assets
and Handle
imports from bevy::asset
is appropriate for managing asset resources and skill handles in the system.
14-14
: Update TSlots
generic to use Handle<Skill>
Changing TSlots
to GetRef<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>>
ensures that slots now store skill handles rather than direct Skill
instances. This aligns with the new asset loading strategy and improves memory efficiency.
20-20
: Inject skills
resource into enqueue
function
Adding skills: Res<Assets<Skill>>
to the function parameters allows access to the skill assets, enabling the retrieval of Skill
instances from their handles.
24-24
: Pass skills
resource to enqueue_new_skills
function
Including &skills
in the call to enqueue_new_skills
ensures that the function has the necessary resources to resolve skill handles to actual skills.
29-34
: Modify enqueue_new_skills
to accept skills
The enqueue_new_skills
function now accepts skills: &Assets<Skill>>
, enabling it to retrieve Skill
instances using the handles provided by slots
.
36-36
: Pass skills
to enqueue_new_skill
Passing skills
to enqueue_new_skill
allows for the resolution of skill handles within the function.
40-45
: Update enqueue_new_skill
to handle skill handles and assets
By accepting skills: &Assets<Skill>>
and updating the generics to use Handle<Skill>
, the function can now retrieve the actual Skill
instances needed for enqueueing.
116-116
: Update _Skills
struct to store Handle<Skill>
Changing _Skills
to hold a HashMap<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>>
reflects the shift to using handles for skill management, which improves consistency with the asset system.
118-119
: Adjust GetRef
implementation for _Skills
The get
method now returns Option<&Handle<Skill>>
, allowing retrieval of skill handles that can be resolved to actual skills elsewhere.
144-146
: Verify skill insertion into Assets<Skill>
in setup
function
Inserting skills using skill_assets.insert(id, skill)
may not align with Bevy's standard asset management practices, which typically auto-generate asset IDs.
Please confirm that manually assigning AssetId
when inserting into Assets<Skill>
is appropriate. If not, consider using the add
method, which returns a Handle<Skill>
:
-for (id, skill) in skills {
- skill_assets.insert(id, skill);
+for (_, skill) in skills {
+ skill_assets.add(skill);
}
This approach leverages Bevy's asset system to manage asset IDs automatically.
Also applies to: 148-154
193-195
: Ensure correct handle usage in enqueue_skill_from_skills
test
In the test, verify that the handle's ID corresponds to the skill inserted into Assets<Skill>
. Using handle.id()
assumes that the handle's ID matches the asset's ID in Assets<Skill>
.
Consider obtaining the handle from skill_assets.add(skill)
to ensure consistency.
Also applies to: 200-204
229-229
: Tests correctly initialize with empty skills where appropriate
In the prime_skill
, prime_skill_matching_with_key
, and prime_all_in_queue
tests, initializing the app with empty skills is suitable, as these tests focus on the queuing and priming logic rather than skill retrieval.
Also applies to: 247-247, 275-275
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs (7)
48-48
: Import of skill_asset
macro is appropriate
The addition of use macros::skill_asset;
correctly brings the skill_asset!
macro into scope for use in asset loading.
51-51
: Proper import of skill-related types
The line use skills::{skill_data::SkillData, QueuedSkill, RunSkillBehavior, Skill};
imports the necessary types for skill execution and data handling, ensuring they're available in this module.
146-150
: Addition of asset_server
parameter to set_player_items
function
Including asset_server: Res<AssetServer>
in the parameters allows the function to load assets, aligning with the need to pass asset_server
to get_inventory
and get_loadout
.
159-160
: Passing asset_server
to helper functions
The asset_server
is appropriately passed to Self::get_inventory
and Self::get_loadout
, enabling these functions to load assets as needed.
166-166
: Definition of get_loadout
with asset_server
parameter
The get_loadout
function now accepts asset_server: &AssetServer
, which is necessary for loading skill assets.
234-234
: Definition of get_inventory
with asset_server
parameter
The get_inventory
function now accepts asset_server: &AssetServer
, which allows it to load skill assets properly.
275-275
: Usage of ComboBundle::with_timeout
is appropriate
The call to ComboBundle::with_timeout(timeout)
correctly initializes the combo bundle with the specified timeout duration.
1f19300
to
3c8acae
Compare
Effectively delays item visualization by one frame, which avoids racing conditions, when render pipe line is ready and sub meshes are being detected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs (1)
31-63
: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the asset loading workflow.The implementation is robust with comprehensive error handling. To improve maintainability, consider adding documentation explaining:
- The expected format of the JSON data
- The relationship between TAsset and TDto
- Examples of typical usage patterns
Add documentation like this:
+/// A generic asset loader that loads assets from JSON files. +/// +/// # Type Parameters +/// +/// * `TAsset` - The final asset type that will be loaded into the game +/// * `TDto` - The intermediate DTO type that the JSON deserializes into +/// +/// # Example JSON Format +/// +/// ```json +/// { +/// // Fields matching TDto structure +/// } +/// ``` impl<TAsset, TDto> AssetLoader for CustomAssetLoader<TAsset, TDto>src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs (3)
Line range hint
17-27
: Document the auto-expansion behavior.The
GetMut
implementation automatically expands the inventory when accessing an out-of-range index. While this behavior is tested, it would be helpful to document this important detail in the implementation comments.Add documentation above the impl block:
+/// Provides mutable access to inventory items. +/// The inventory automatically expands with None values when accessing an out-of-range index. impl GetMut<InventoryKey, Option<SkillItem>> for Inventory {
29-34
: Consider using vec::resize_with for better performance.The current implementation uses a loop to push items individually. For better performance with large expansions, consider using
Vec::resize_with
.fn fill(inventory: &mut Vec<Option<SkillItem>>, inventory_key: usize) { - let fill_len = inventory_key - inventory.len() + 1; - for _ in 0..fill_len { - inventory.push(None); - } + inventory.resize_with(inventory_key + 1, || None); }
Line range hint
36-124
: Consider adding a stress test for large expansions.The current tests cover the basic functionality well, but consider adding a test case for large index values to ensure performance characteristics are acceptable.
Add a test like this:
#[test] fn get_item_mut_large_expansion() { let mut inventory = Inventory::new([]); let large_index = 10000; // This should not cause performance issues inventory.get_mut(&InventoryKey(large_index)); assert_eq!(inventory.0.len(), large_index + 1); assert!(inventory.0.iter().all(|item| item.is_none())); }src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs (1)
28-35
: Consider enhancing error handling in skill handle retrieval.The current implementation silently returns
None
when either the slot is empty or the skill handle is missing. Consider adding logging or error context to help diagnose issues during development.impl GetRef<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>> for Slots { fn get(&self, key: &SlotKey) -> Option<&Handle<Skill>> { - let item: &SkillItem = self.get(key)?; - - item.content.skill.as_ref() + let item: &SkillItem = self.get(key).or_else(|| { + debug!("No skill item found in slot: {:?}", key); + None + })?; + + item.content.skill.as_ref().or_else(|| { + debug!("Skill item found but no skill handle present: {:?}", item); + None + }) } }src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs (1)
124-128
: Consider enhancing the error message with the actual path.The error message could be more helpful by including the constructed path that was not found.
- compile_error!("No skill with that name found in `assets/skills/`") + compile_error!(concat!("No skill found at `", #path, "`"))src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs (1)
119-127
: Consider adding documentation for error handling.The Error trait implementation is well-structured and maintains proper error chains. Consider adding documentation to explain the error hierarchy and how errors propagate through the asset loading system.
Add documentation above the implementation:
+/// Implements std::error::Error for LoadError, maintaining the error chain +/// through the source() method. This allows tracking the original cause of +/// failures during asset loading. impl Error for LoadError {src/plugins/skills/src/systems/enqueue.rs (3)
14-28
: LGTM: System parameter changes follow Bevy's best practices.The addition of
skills: Res<Assets<Skill>>
parameter and its usage follows Bevy's recommended patterns for asset access in systems. This ensures efficient read-only access to skill assets across the system.Consider adding error logging when skills cannot be accessed, as this could help diagnose asset loading issues in production.
40-54
: Consider enhancing error handling for skill asset retrieval.While the code correctly handles skill asset retrieval, it silently fails when a skill cannot be found. This could make debugging difficult in production.
Consider adding debug logging when skill retrieval fails:
fn enqueue_new_skill<TSlots: GetRef<SlotKey, Handle<Skill>>, TQueue: Enqueue<(Skill, SlotKey)>>( key: &SlotKey, queue: &mut TQueue, slots: &TSlots, skills: &Assets<Skill>, ) { let Some(skill) = slots.get(key).cloned() else { + debug!("No skill handle found for slot key: {:?}", key); return; }; let Some(skill) = skills.get(&skill).cloned() else { + debug!("Failed to load skill asset: {:?}", skill); return; };
Line range hint
144-295
: LGTM: Test changes properly cover asset-based skill handling.The test setup and cases correctly handle the new asset-based approach. The mock implementations and assertions are appropriate.
Consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:
- Attempting to enqueue a skill with an invalid handle
- Attempting to enqueue a skill that exists in slots but not in assets
- Testing concurrent access to skill assets from multiple systems
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs (1)
Line range hint
166-232
: Consider extracting common SkillItemContent creation logic.While the asset loading implementation is correct, there's repeated code for creating similar SkillItemContent structures for plasma pistols. Consider extracting this into a helper function.
Example refactor:
fn create_pistol_item(name: &str, asset_server: &AssetServer) -> SkillItem { SkillItem { name, content: SkillItemContent { render: Renderer { model: ModelRender::Hand(AssetModel::Path("models/pistol.glb")), essence: EssenceRender::StandardMaterial, }, skill: Some(asset_server.load(skill_asset!("shoot_hand_gun"))), item_type: SkillItemType::Pistol, }, } }src/plugins/menu/src/systems/dropdown/insert_skill_select_dropdown.rs (2)
43-57
: LGTM! Consider using HashSet for seen skills.The implementation correctly prevents duplicate skills in the dropdown. However, since we're only checking for containment, using a
HashSet
instead of aVec
forseen
could be more efficient, especially with a large number of skills.- let mut seen = Vec::new(); + let mut seen = HashSet::new(); let skills = skills .iter() .filter(|(_, skill)| { if !skill.is_usable_with.contains(&item.content.item_type) { return false; } - if seen.contains(skill) { + if !seen.insert(skill) { return false; } - - seen.push(skill); true })
184-262
: Consider improving test clarity and efficiency.While the test correctly verifies skill deduplication, consider these improvements:
- Rename the test to be more specific, e.g.,
test_dropdown_deduplicates_identical_skills
- Simplify the test by using just one duplicate skill instead of including an additional unique skill
- Add a comment explaining that the duplicate skills are intentional for testing deduplication
- fn list_unique_skills() { + fn test_dropdown_deduplicates_identical_skills() { + // Create two identical skills to verify deduplication let image_b = new_handle(); let skills = [ - Skill { - name: "skill a".to_owned(), - is_usable_with: HashSet::from([SkillItemType::Pistol]), - icon: Some(image_a.clone()), - ..default() - }, Skill { name: "skill b".to_owned(), is_usable_with: HashSet::from([SkillItemType::Pistol, SkillItemType::Bracer]), icon: Some(image_b.clone()), ..default() }, Skill { name: "skill b".to_owned(), is_usable_with: HashSet::from([SkillItemType::Pistol, SkillItemType::Bracer]), icon: Some(image_b.clone()), ..default() }, ];src/plugins/skills/src/components/combo_node.rs (2)
Line range hint
22-24
: Consider adding documentation for the ComboNode struct.While the implementation is solid, adding documentation comments (///) would improve code maintainability by explaining:
- The purpose of the ComboNode structure
- The relationship between skills and nodes
- The significance of ordering in the combo system
+/// A tree structure representing skill combinations where each node contains a skill and its possible follow-up skills. +/// The order of combinations is preserved using OrderedHashMap to maintain consistent combo sequences. #[derive(Component, Clone, PartialEq, Debug)] pub struct ComboNode<TSkill = Skill>(OrderedHashMap<SlotKey, (TSkill, ComboNode<TSkill>)>);
Line range hint
302-303
: Consider adding tests for asset path-based skill loading.With the transition from UUID to asset-based skill identification, consider adding test cases that verify:
- Loading skills from valid asset paths
- Handling of invalid asset paths
- Path resolution edge cases
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
assets/skills/force_shield.skill
(0 hunks)assets/skills/gravity_well.skill
(0 hunks)assets/skills/shoot_hand_gun.skill
(0 hunks)src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets/app.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets/app.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/macros/Cargo.toml
(1 hunks)src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/lib.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/dropdown/insert_skill_select_dropdown.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/equipped_items.rs
(5 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs
(8 hunks)src/plugins/menu/src/systems/update_panels/get_quickbar_icons.rs
(13 hunks)src/plugins/skills/Cargo.toml
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs
(3 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/components/combo_node.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs
(6 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs
(4 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs
(2 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs
(11 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/skills.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/skills/skill_data.rs
(1 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/enqueue.rs
(8 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/equip.rs
(7 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/uuid_to_skill.rs
(0 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/systems/visualize_slot_items.rs
(6 hunks)src/plugins/skills/src/traits.rs
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- assets/skills/force_shield.skill
- assets/skills/gravity_well.skill
- assets/skills/shoot_hand_gun.skill
- src/plugins/skills/src/skills.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems/uuid_to_skill.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/traits.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (17)
- src/plugins/items/src/lib.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/lib.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/traits.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_assets/app.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets.rs
- src/plugins/loading/src/traits/register_custom_folder_assets/app.rs
- src/plugins/macros/Cargo.toml
- src/plugins/menu/src/lib.rs
- src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/equipped_items.rs
- src/plugins/menu/src/systems/items/swap/inventory_items.rs
- src/plugins/menu/src/systems/update_panels/get_quickbar_icons.rs
- src/plugins/skills/Cargo.toml
- src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/skills/skill_data.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems/equip.rs
- src/plugins/skills/src/systems/visualize_slot_items.rs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs (1)
Learnt from: codaishin
PR: codaishin/project-zyheeda-bevy#283
File: src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs:115-119
Timestamp: 2024-11-07T18:10:42.156Z
Learning: In the `skill_asset` macro in `src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs`, skill names do not require additional input validation beyond checking that the corresponding skill file exists.
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/plugins/loading/src/asset_loader.rs (3)
1-11
: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definition.
The imports are minimal and well-organized. The struct definition correctly uses PhantomData for zero-sized type parameters and has appropriate crate-level visibility.
23-29
: LGTM! Correct Default implementation.
The implementation follows Rust idioms for PhantomData initialization.
31-63
: Verify the asset loading implementation usage.
Let's verify how this loader is being used in the codebase, particularly for skill assets.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the skill asset implementation and usage.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The asset loading implementation is correctly used and integrated
The verification shows that:
SkillData
properly implementsAssetFileExtensions
with the ".skill" extensionSkill
correctly implementsLoadFrom<SkillData>
with proper asset conversion- The custom asset loader is properly integrated through the registration system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all asset registrations and skill-related asset types
echo "Searching for asset registrations using CustomAssetLoader..."
rg -l "CustomAssetLoader" --type rust
echo -e "\nSearching for skill asset type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $name:ident {
$$$
}
where
$$$
Asset $$$
$$$'
echo -e "\nSearching for skill file extensions..."
rg "asset_file_extensions" --type rust -A 2
Length of output: 3577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find skill asset implementation and registration
echo "Searching for skill asset implementation..."
rg -A 10 "impl.*Asset.*Skill" --type rust
echo -e "\nSearching for skill asset registration..."
rg -A 5 "register_custom_asset.*Skill" --type rust
echo -e "\nSearching for SkillData struct definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'struct SkillData {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\nLooking for LoadFrom implementation for skills..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl LoadFrom<$_> for $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4605
src/plugins/skills/src/components/inventory.rs (1)
8-8
: LGTM: Type simplification aligns with PR objectives.
The removal of the generic type parameter from Inventory
aligns well with treating skills as standard assets, making the code more straightforward.
Let's verify this change doesn't break any existing usages:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the Inventory
type usage across the codebase:
Verified: Type simplification is safe and consistent
The removal of the generic type parameter from Inventory
is safe as all usages across the codebase consistently use it with Option<SkillItem>
. The change aligns with treating skills as standard assets and maintains compatibility with all existing implementations:
- All imports and usages in menu systems
- Trait implementations for
GetRef
andGetMut
- Integration with game state management
- Swap and inventory management systems
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining generic Inventory usage that might need updating
rg "Inventory<" --type rust
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find all usages of Inventory type
rg "Inventory" --type rust -B 2 -A 2
# Also search for any imports of the Inventory type
rg "use.*Inventory" --type rust
Length of output: 32575
src/plugins/skills/src/components/slots.rs (2)
1-7
: LGTM! Clean struct definition with appropriate trait derivations.
The simplified Slots
struct without generic parameters aligns well with the PR's objective of treating skills as standard assets. The use of HashMap
provides efficient slot-based storage with O(1) access time.
Line range hint 37-125
: Consider adding tests for edge cases.
While the current test coverage is good, consider adding tests for these scenarios:
- Empty slots (HashMap entry with
Some(None)
) - Invalid skill handles
- Multiple slots with various states
Let's check if these cases are tested elsewhere:
src/plugins/macros/src/lib.rs (1)
113-133
: LGTM! The implementation aligns with the PR objectives.
The macro correctly implements the new approach of treating skills as standard assets, with appropriate validation and error handling.
src/plugins/loading/src/folder_asset_loader.rs (2)
107-117
: LGTM! Well-implemented error messages.
The Display implementation provides clear, user-friendly error messages for each error type. This implementation effectively addresses the previous review comment about enhancing error handling.
107-127
: Verify error handling in skill loading code.
Let's ensure that skill loading code properly handles these error cases.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the error handling implementation and usage.
Based on the extensive search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the error handling implementation:
Error handling is properly implemented and consistent with asset loading system
The error handling implementation in LoadError
is well integrated with Bevy's asset loading system and properly handles all error cases:
-
The error types are used consistently throughout the codebase:
LoadError::IO
for file reading errorsLoadError::ParseChars
for character encoding errorsLoadError::ParseObject
for JSON parsing errors
-
The implementation is used by both the custom asset loader (
CustomAssetLoader
) and folder asset loader (FolderAssetLoader
) to handle skill loading and other assets in a consistent way. -
The error handling integrates with Bevy's asset system through:
- Proper implementation of
Error
andDisplay
traits - Integration with
LoadResult
enum that wraps assets and errors - Consistent error propagation through the asset loading pipeline
- Proper implementation of
-
The error handling is actively used by the skill loading system through the
register_custom_folder_assets
functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if skill loading code properly handles LoadError cases
# Search for skill loading code that might use this error handling
rg -l "\.skill'?" | xargs rg "LoadResult|LoadError" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any custom error handling in skill-related files
rg -l "skill" | xargs rg "impl.*Error" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for LoadError usage in the codebase
rg "LoadError" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for skill asset loading implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for $_ {
$$$
load($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for any asset loading related traits and their implementations
rg "Asset|Loader" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 213541
src/plugins/skills/src/systems/enqueue.rs (1)
7-14
: LGTM: Import changes and type signatures align with asset-based approach.
The changes correctly introduce the necessary Bevy asset types and update the generic parameter to use Handle<Skill>
, aligning with the PR's objective to treat skills as standard assets.
src/plugins/skills/src/lib.rs (5)
48-48
: LGTM: Import changes align with asset-based skill management.
The changes to imports reflect the transition from UUID-based to asset-based skill management, which aligns with the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 51-51
102-104
: LGTM: Simplified equip_item system registration.
The removal of SkillId generics simplifies the system registration while maintaining the functionality.
146-154
: LGTM: Proper asset server injection.
The addition of the asset server parameter follows Bevy's dependency injection patterns and enables proper asset loading.
271-275
: LGTM: Simplified combo system.
The combo system has been simplified to only maintain timeout functionality, which aligns with the PR's objective of streamlining skill management.
Line range hint 234-269
: Verify asset paths exist.
The implementation correctly uses asset loading, but we should verify that all referenced skill assets exist in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the model assets as well since they are also referenced in the code.
All referenced assets exist in the project
The verification confirms that:
- The skill asset
shoot_hand_gun.skill
exists atassets/skills/shoot_hand_gun.skill
- The model asset
pistol.glb
exists atassets/models/pistol.glb
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all referenced skill assets exist
# Extract skill asset paths and check if they exist
# Search for skill_asset! macro usage and verify the paths
rg --no-filename 'skill_asset!\("([^"]+)"\)' -or '$1' | while read -r path; do
echo "Checking for skill asset: $path"
fd -e skill "$path"
done
Length of output: 1244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced model files exist
fd -e glb "pistol.glb"
Length of output: 47
src/plugins/skills/src/components/combo_node.rs (2)
8-8
: LGTM! Import changes align with PR objectives.
The removal of the TryMap
trait from imports is consistent with the goal of treating skills as standard assets, simplifying the skill handling system.
Line range hint 1-1000
: Verify complete removal of UUID references.
Let's ensure there are no remaining UUID references in the codebase that might affect this implementation.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that all UUID references in the codebase are related to asset handling (Bevy's asset system) and UI components, not for skill identification. The UUIDs are being used appropriately for:
- Asset handles in the Bevy engine (images, meshes, scenes)
- UI components (fonts, icons)
- Resource management and caching
- Animation system
There are no UUID references in the skill system implementation or the combo system, confirming that the changes align with removing UUID-based skill identification while maintaining proper asset handling where needed.
Changes verified: UUID usage properly confined to asset management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining UUID references in skill-related code
echo "Checking for UUID references in skill-related code..."
rg -i "uuid" --type rust
Length of output: 6489
src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs (5)
3-3
: Addition of combos::Combos
Import
Including combos::Combos
in the import statements ensures that the Combos
type is available for use in the ComboBundle
struct.
11-11
: Addition of item::SkillItem
Import
The import of item::SkillItem
provides access to the SkillItem
type used within the Loadout
struct.
20-20
: Update combos
Field in ComboBundle
Struct
The combos: Combos
field in the ComboBundle
struct initializes the combos component, aligning with the updated design to manage combos without SkillId
.
35-35
: Simplify slot_definition
Field in Loadout
Struct
Changing the slot_definition
field to Slots
simplifies slot management by removing unnecessary generic parameters, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
40-40
: Update new
Method Signature in Loadout
The new
method's parameter type is updated from Option<SkillItem<SkillId>>
to Option<SkillItem>
, reflecting the removal of SkillId
and streamlining the API.
Please verify that all instances of SkillItem<SkillId>
have been updated throughout the codebase to prevent type mismatches.
Run the following script to confirm that there are no remaining references to SkillItem<SkillId>
:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now generate the final response:
No Type Mismatches Found - SkillItem
Usage is Consistent
The codebase shows that SkillItem
is consistently used without the SkillId
generic parameter. The type is defined as pub type SkillItem = Item<SkillItemContent<Handle<Skill>>>
in src/plugins/skills/src/item.rs
and all usages across the codebase follow this definition. The change in the new
method signature is consistent with the rest of the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining usage of `SkillItem<SkillId>` in the codebase
# Test: Find instances of `SkillItem<SkillId>`. Expect: No matches
rg -F 'SkillItem<SkillId>'
Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search approach
# 1. Search for SkillItem type usage patterns
rg "SkillItem\s*<" --type rust
# 2. Look for SkillId type usage
rg "SkillId" --type rust -A 2 -B 2
# 3. Find the SkillItem type definition to understand its structure
rg "struct\s+SkillItem" --type rust -A 5
Length of output: 435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of SkillItem in the codebase
# 1. Search for SkillItem (without generic parameter) to see current usage
rg "\bSkillItem\b" --type rust -A 2 -B 2
# 2. Look at the bundles.rs file to understand the context better
cat src/plugins/skills/src/bundles.rs
# 3. Look for any type aliases or uses of SkillItem
rg "type.*SkillItem" --type rust
rg "use.*SkillItem" --type rust
Length of output: 51248
3c8acae
to
8d60387
Compare
Treat skills as normal assets and load them through providing paths to the
.skill
files instead of an artificial uuid.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores