Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can remove treasuryRewardCut from ForfeitHandler.sol #379

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Can remove treasuryRewardCut from ForfeitHandler.sol #379

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

harleythedog

Vulnerability details

Impact

In ForfeitHandler.sol, there are two values swingTraderRewardCut and treasuryRewardCut , and these values always sum to 1000. Instead of having to go through all of the logic of setting these values independently and always ensuring that they sum to 1000, it would be simpler (and definitely save a lot of gas) if you simply removed everything related to treasuryRewardCut and always just used 1000-swingTraderRewardCut in its place.

This also is more similar to what is done in StabilizerNode.sol where treasuryCut is simply what is left over after other components have taken their cut.

Proof of Concept

See ForfeitHandler.sol here: https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-11-malt/blob/main/src/contracts/ForfeitHandler.sol

Tools Used

Inspection

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Simplify logic and save gas by removing treasuryRewardCut.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Dec 1, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@0xScotch 0xScotch added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Dec 8, 2021
@GalloDaSballo
Copy link
Collaborator

Agree with finding, the variable is unused

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants