Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value
Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly
Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments)
Judge has reviewed and integrated all feedback
Improvements or additions to documentation
Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue
This issue or pull request already exists
Judge should review this issue
Extra attention is needed
This report is of especially high quality
Discussion about this issue is ongoing, and not yet resolved.
Judge should review this issue
This report is of especially low quality
Issue is high quality, but not accepted
This finding falls outside the contest scope as delineated in the contest README
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%)
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)
Highest quality submission among a set of duplicates
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
Further information is requested
Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards