Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do not use _mint of OZ but rather safeMint #348

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Do not use _mint of OZ but rather safeMint #348

code423n4 opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/main/contracts/enforcer/HolographERC721.sol#L406
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/main/contracts/enforcer/HolographERC721.sol#L514

Vulnerability details

Impact

When calling the "sourceMint" or "bridgeIn" function for minting an NFT of a NFT collection, the OpenZeppelin’s ERC721 contract’s _mint function is used to mint the NFT to a receiver. If such receiver is a contract that does not support the ERC721 protocol, the NFT will be locked and cannot be retrieved.

Proof of Concept

see links to affected code.

Tools Used

Manual audit

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Use safeMint from OZ
@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Oct 25, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2022
@code423n4
RedOneN issue #348
c0fdeaa
@gzeoneth
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #462

@gzeoneth gzeoneth marked this as a duplicate of #462 Oct 30, 2022
@gzeoneth gzeoneth added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Oct 30, 2022
@gzeoneth gzeoneth added QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax and removed 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value labels Nov 21, 2022
@gzeoneth
Copy link
Member

Consider with #73

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@code423n4 @gzeoneth