-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QA Report #171
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
edited-by-warden
grade-b
high quality report
This report is of especially high quality
Q-04
QA (Quality Assurance)
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
sponsor acknowledged
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
Comments
c4-bot-9
added
bug
Something isn't working
QA (Quality Assurance)
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
labels
Dec 8, 2023
c4-bot-10
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
c4-bot-10
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
c4-bot-5
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
c4-bot-7
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
c4-bot-7
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2023
Possible upgrade: L-09 --> #277 |
raymondfam marked the issue as high quality report |
c4-pre-sort
added
the
high quality report
This report is of especially high quality
label
Dec 10, 2023
don't agree with 1,3, 5 and 7 |
viraj124 (sponsor) acknowledged |
c4-sponsor
added
the
sponsor acknowledged
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
label
Dec 12, 2023
8R, 5NC [L-01]
|
0xA5DF marked the issue as grade-a |
0xA5DF marked the issue as grade-b |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
edited-by-warden
grade-b
high quality report
This report is of especially high quality
Q-04
QA (Quality Assurance)
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
sponsor acknowledged
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
See the markdown file with the details of this report here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: