Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Connect from an oleobject using COM connection (VB 6, Powerbuilder...) #108

Closed
abelrodriguez opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #109
Closed

Connect from an oleobject using COM connection (VB 6, Powerbuilder...) #108

abelrodriguez opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #109

Comments

@abelrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

Type of issue

[ ] Bug
[ ] Question (e.g. about handling/usage)
[X] Request for new feature/improvement

Expected Behavior

Connect from an oleobject using COM connection (VB 6, Powerbuilder...)

Current Behavior

To connect from an oleobject from VB 6 or Powerbuilder, we need a constructor without parameters since it is not possible to parameterize it.

In addition, COM connections are not compatible with generic collections, throws an exception "function name not found".

This can be solved by eliminating the generic collections, since it would not affect the current functionality, and creating a constructor without parameters. Subsequently, the QRCodeData object that is currently assigned in the constructor with parameters, would be added manually with SetQRCodeData function

Possible Solution (optional)

I will create a Pull Request with this new feature

Your Environment

Version used: 1.3.3
Environment: Powerbuilder 6.5 & Powerbuilder 10.5

abelrodriguez added a commit to abelrodriguez/QRCoder that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2018
…der)

To connect from an oleobject from VB 6 or Powerbuilder, we need a
constructor without parameters since it is not possible to parameterize
it.

In addition, COM connections are not compatible with generic collections,
throws an exception "function name not found".

This can be solved by eliminating the generic collections, since it would
not affect the current functionality, and creating a constructor without
parameters. Subsequently, the QRCodeData object that is currently assigned
in the constructor with parameters, would be added manually with
SetQRCodeData function

Resolves: codebude#108
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants