fix: Attempt to fix flags sessions failing

[RulaKhaled]

Purpose/Motivation

What is the feature? Why is this being done?
The error here is failing the flags selector, this is an attempt of resolving the error https://codecov.sentry.io/issues/4522401648/?environment=production&project=5215654&q[…]referrer=issue-stream&statsPeriod=1h&stream_index=1&utc=true

Links to relevant tickets

What does this PR do?

Include a brief description of the changes in this PR. Bullet points are your friend.

Notes to Reviewer

Anything to note to the team? Any tips on how to review, or where to start?

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2d91292) 95.56% compared to head (dcf0635) 95.54%.

❗ Current head dcf0635 differs from pull request most recent head dd9bd94. Consider uploading reports for the commit dd9bd94 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #301     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   95.56   95.54   -0.02     
=======================================
  Files        726     726             
  Lines      16178   16178             
=======================================
- Hits       15459   15456      -3     
- Misses       719     722      +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	?
unit-latest-uploader	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov-qa]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2d91292) 95.64% compared to head (dd9bd94) 95.64%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #301   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.64%   95.64%           
=======================================
  Files         612      612           
  Lines       15770    15770           
=======================================
  Hits        15084    15084           
  Misses        686      686           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	95.64% <ø> (ø)
unit-latest-uploader	95.64% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov-public-qa]

Codecov Report

Merging #301 (dd9bd94) into main (2d91292) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #301   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.64%   95.64%           
=======================================
  Files         612      612           
  Lines       15770    15770           
=======================================
  Hits        15084    15084           
  Misses        686      686           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	95.64% <ø> (ø)
unit-latest-uploader	95.64% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
services/report.py	96.63% <ø> (ø)