feat: Update to block users from accessing app if guest set to false for enterprise

[RulaKhaled]

Purpose/Motivation

What is the feature? Why is this being done?
This change affects enterprise users only. We need a setting to disable guest access where it is enabled by default. We are looking to block guest users from accessing ALL enterprise pages and redirect them back to the login page, as we technically cannot block them there

Links to relevant tickets

codecov/feedback#252

closes: codecov/feedback#297

What does this PR do?

Include a brief description of the changes in this PR. Bullet points are your friend.

Notes to Reviewer

Anything to note to the team? Any tips on how to review, or where to start?

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

[codecov-qa]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.06%. Comparing base (56d6eee) to head (31c967d).

Files	Patch %	Lines
codecov/settings_enterprise.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.06%   96.06%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         643      643              
  Lines       17117    17129      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        16444    16455      +11     
- Misses        673      674       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	96.06% <92.30%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit-latest-uploader	96.06% <92.30%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov-public-qa]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (56d6eee) 96.06% compared to head (31c967d) 96.06%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.06%   96.06%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         643      643              
  Lines       17117    17129      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        16444    16455      +11     
- Misses        673      674       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	96.06% <92.30%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit-latest-uploader	96.06% <92.30%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
codecov/settings_base.py	85.86% <ø> (ø)
codecov/settings_dev.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
codecov_auth/middleware.py	98.76% <100.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
codecov/settings_enterprise.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

[codecov-staging]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files	Patch %	Lines
codecov/settings_enterprise.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 95.89%. Comparing base (db019c3) to head (c44cf4a).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head c44cf4a differs from pull request most recent head d48379f. Consider uploading reports for the commit d48379f to get more accurate results

Changes have been made to critical files, which contain lines commonly executed in production. Learn more

Files	Patch %	Lines
codecov/settings_enterprise.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #417     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   95.79   95.89   +0.10     
=======================================
  Files        757     763      +6     
  Lines      17293   18655   +1362     
=======================================
+ Hits       16565   17889   +1324     
- Misses       728     766     +38     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	96.05% <88.88%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unit-latest-uploader	96.05% <88.88%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[giovanni-guidini]

LGTM

[jerrodcodecov]

@RulaKhaled are we ready to merge this one?

[RulaKhaled]

@RulaKhaled are we ready to merge this one?

I was hoping to test this on staging before merging, but I guess there's no easy way to test API changes for self-hosted. So, yeah, I'll give this one last local test round and send it