add comment for disabled CARRYFORWARD_BASE_SEARCH_RANGE experiment #522
Conversation
as the comment says, the results of this experiment (see them [here](https://l.codecov.dev/DPGxQO)) went back and forth on whether it did anything. there's no particular urgency behind rolling this out anymore, so i'm shutting off the experiment i'm leaving the `Feature` here as a knob to turn if we get a support request about missing CFFs / maybe it will spark somebody in the future to retry the experiment for more conclusive results
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #522 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.47% 97.47%
=======================================
Files 417 417
Lines 34828 34828
=======================================
Hits 33948 33948
Misses 880 880
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #522 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.47% 97.47%
=======================================
Files 417 417
Lines 34828 34828
=======================================
Hits 33948 33948
Misses 880 880
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #522 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.47% 97.47%
=======================================
Files 417 417
Lines 34828 34828
=======================================
Hits 33948 33948
Misses 880 880
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Changes have been made to critical files, which contain lines commonly executed in production. Learn more ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #522 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.49% 97.49%
=======================================
Files 448 448
Lines 35557 35557
=======================================
Hits 34667 34667
Misses 890 890
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
This change has been scanned for critical changes. Learn more |
as the comment says, the results of this experiment (see them here) went back and forth on whether it did anything. there's no particular urgency behind rolling this out anymore, so i'm shutting off the experiment
i'm leaving the
Featurehere as a knob to turn if we get a support request about missing CFFs / maybe it will spark somebody in the future to retry the experiment for more conclusive resultshttps://github.com/codecov/internal-issues/issues/405
Legal Boilerplate
Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.