Skip to content

Conversation

@divsan93
Copy link
Collaborator

@divsan93 divsan93 commented Jun 17, 2025

When the user passes a new analysis level for CLDK, but an analysis.json artifact exisits in the cache, the python API ignores the user's upgraded request for a deeper analysis level.

Motivation and Context

This change ensures the the analysis.json cache has be updated upon the user's new request for a different analysis level.

How Has This Been Tested?

All the existing test cases pass.

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the Codellm-Devkit Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@divsan93 divsan93 requested a review from rahlk June 17, 2025 13:15
@rahlk rahlk changed the title checking the compatibility of analysis.json with the passed analysis … Check the compatibility of cached analysis.json with what is the passed as an argument. Jun 23, 2025
@rahlk rahlk added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 23, 2025
@rahlk rahlk merged commit 8489929 into main Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check if the existing analysis file is compatible with the passed analysis level

3 participants