Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: improve system color scheme support and documentation #1050

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

danilowoz
Copy link
Member

This improves the system color scheme support by listening to system color changes, and setting a preferrable color scheme to the sandpack theme context. Plus, it improves the documentation by mentioning that "auto" value will reflects the system color scheme, which can be the default values (light or dark)

Added auto mode to themeContext and setPreferredTheme
Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web EditorVS CodeInsiders

Open Preview

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sandpack-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2024 11:20am

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jan 3, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit d9db490:

Sandbox Source
Sandpack Configuration
sandpack-run-stale-value Configuration

Added 'auto' option to DevToolsTheme and themeMode
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexnm alexnm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link

@pester-by-codesandbox pester-by-codesandbox bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A collaborator issued an after-the-fact review beginning with the 👍 emoji, so this PR is now approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants