Skip to content

Conversation

@marcinczenko
Copy link
Collaborator

As a starting point for the spec we could use our proposal. It already provides background and draft of the solution.

TBD: add more explicit assumptions and the corresponding requirements

I would suggest to wait with adding too much details till we have a prototype that still uses Codex REST API. At that point we can also start adding specs for the Codex Lib (codex-storage/nim-codex#1220).

@marcinczenko marcinczenko changed the title codex-status-go prototype spec codex-status-go prototype docs Sep 13, 2025
@marcinczenko marcinczenko force-pushed the spec/codex-status-go-prototype branch from 281760c to 886144a Compare September 20, 2025 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants