Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Neat 80 workflow visualization of information rules using mock data. part 2 update mock graph generator #309

Conversation

nikokaoja
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@doctrino doctrino changed the base branch from main to NEAT-32-Workflow-Visualization-of-Information-Rules-using-mock-data March 15, 2024 06:58
Copy link
Collaborator

@doctrino doctrino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I got the context now for the other PR. Seems this is mainly shuffling around code.

Comment on lines +1 to +3
"""This module is used to generate mock graph data for purposes of testing of NEAT.
It is a bit ugly and needs some proper refactoring, but it is not a priority at the moment.
"""
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggest adding a Jira task on this in the technical debt epic.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Abs!

Base automatically changed from NEAT-32-Workflow-Visualization-of-Information-Rules-using-mock-data to main March 15, 2024 08:54
@nikokaoja nikokaoja merged commit 0baf0ee into main Mar 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@nikokaoja nikokaoja deleted the NEAT-80-Workflow-Visualization-of-Information-Rules-using-mock-data.-Part-2-Update-Mock-Graph-Generator branch March 15, 2024 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants