Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add schemaeditor support #11

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 14, 2016
Merged

Conversation

datakurre
Copy link
Contributor

Could someone familiar with schema editor framework to verify that this is the correct way to register a schema editor feature for behavior.

How this should work:
0. When behavior is not enabled, nothing happens

  1. When behavior is enabled, field settings have a boolean "Searchable" option

nayttokuva 2014-8-16 kello 17 12 49

@lukasgraf
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me, though I never use any of the TTW functionality. Could you provide a test for this so we don't accidentally break this feature in the future?

@datakurre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool. It will take a while for me to find time for those tests, but I'll write them :)

@datakurre datakurre force-pushed the datakurre-schemaeditor-support branch from 3fbc542 to 28cd392 Compare February 23, 2016 10:53
@Martronic-SA
Copy link

This seems to work and has to be merged!

@lukasgraf
Copy link
Member

@Martronic-SA as mentioned above, tests are still missing for this. @datakurre any update on this?

@datakurre
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry, I forgot. Within the next few days :)

@lukasgraf
Copy link
Member

Excellent, thank you :)

@datakurre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lukasgraf Done.

@lukasgraf
Copy link
Member

@datakurre awesome, thank you! 🎉 🍰

@lukasgraf lukasgraf merged commit 9216449 into master Apr 14, 2016
@lukasgraf lukasgraf deleted the datakurre-schemaeditor-support branch April 14, 2016 08:16
@lukasgraf
Copy link
Member

@Martronic-SA released collective.dexteritytextindexer == 2.1.0 containing this feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants