Add mill.define.DynamicModule to allow custom overriding of millModuleDirectChildren
#2574
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2573
For now, I just preserved the
def millModuleDirectChildrenoverriding. I couldn't figure out how to getdef enabled: Booleanworking without causing circular dependencies betweeninstantiateModuledepend onresolveDirectChildren0, resulting in an infinite recursion. Avoiding the infinite recursion would require some re-working onResolveCore.scala. That can come in a follow-up, for now I just want to fix the regression and preserve the status quo (except for the new requirement of needing to extend a marker trait)