Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Print latest *applicable* version of packages on conflicts #508

Closed
bergmark opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Print latest *applicable* version of packages on conflicts #508

bergmark opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@bergmark
Copy link
Member

bergmark commented Jul 3, 2015

Extension of #450, showing the latest isn't helpful when there is an upper bound, e.g.

--  Failure when adding dependencies:
      classy-prelude-conduit: needed (<0.12), latest is 0.12.0, but 0.12.0 found
      xml-conduit: needed (<1.3), latest is 1.3.0, but 1.3.0 found

Here it would be more useful to show the latest version of classy-prelude-conduit that's < 0.12. Perhaps change the message to say "latest applicable is ..."

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor

snoyberg commented Jul 3, 2015

Want to take a stab at this? May be faster than iterating together, and
this code is pretty well isolated.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015, 11:24 AM Adam Bergmark notifications@github.com
wrote:

Extension of #450 #450,
showing the latest isn't helpful when there is an upper bound, e.g.

-- Failure when adding dependencies:
classy-prelude-conduit: needed (<0.12), latest is 0.12.0, but 0.12.0 found
xml-conduit: needed (<1.3), latest is 1.3.0, but 1.3.0 found

Here it would be more useful to show the latest version of
classy-prelude-conduit that's < 0.12. Perhaps change the message to say
"latest applicable is ..."


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#508.

@bergmark
Copy link
Member Author

bergmark commented Jul 3, 2015

I might take a look over the weekend

@snoyberg snoyberg added this to the 0.3.0.0 milestone Jul 5, 2015
@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor

Updating with awaiting-pr label

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor

snoyberg commented Oct 9, 2015

Bump

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants