Skip to content

Conversation

bmonkman
Copy link
Contributor

breaking change: Switched back to using the worker security group instead of the "cluster primary" security group - we were only using it because we weren't creating a custom launch template and with this change we will be. If you are trying to upgrade, this map require tmeporarily adding a security group rule to allow your old node groups to access the db, bringing up new node groups with the new configuration, then removing your old node groups.

Description

Please explain the changes you made here and link to any relevant issues.

Checklist

…to have many more IPs (17 -> 110), also change how the eks module accepts node group parameters.

breaking change: Switched back to using the worker security group instead of the "cluster primary" security group - we were only using it because we weren't creating a custom launch template and with this change we will be. If you are trying to upgrade, this map require tmeporarily adding a security group rule to allow your old node groups to access the db, bringing up new node groups with the new configuration, then removing your old node groups.
@bmonkman bmonkman requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2021 20:47
@bmonkman bmonkman requested a review from davidcheung August 13, 2021 20:47
@github-actions
Copy link

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Validation 🤖Success! The configuration is valid.

Copy link
Contributor

@davidcheung davidcheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

*Node group configuration schema:*
```
{
node_name: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would group_name slightly better? or just name

@github-actions
Copy link

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Validation 🤖Success! The configuration is valid.

@bmonkman bmonkman merged commit 6072fd9 into main Aug 16, 2021
@bmonkman bmonkman deleted the add-eks-prefix-delegation-support branch August 16, 2021 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants