Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optional codegen args #332

Merged

Conversation

illusional
Copy link
Contributor

Reopens #330

Thanks @mr-c for testing this in CWLUtils. Unfortunately the parameter reordering broke the parsing. I've added b9a30ff to address this problem by making doc.load to use kwargs (named arguments) instead of the original ordered arguments.

I'll issue a CWL-utils PR with the updated generated code and hopefully travis will pass these to show this fix.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #332 into master will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #332      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.60%   69.70%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        2820     2829       +9     
  Branches      738      743       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1963     1972       +9     
  Misses        675      675              
  Partials      182      182              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
schema_salad/codegen.py 95.12% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
schema_salad/codegen_base.py 94.44% <100.00%> (ø)
schema_salad/java_codegen.py 94.00% <100.00%> (ø)
schema_salad/python_codegen.py 98.55% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ac0a15...09b805e. Read the comment docs.

@mr-c mr-c merged commit ea0518b into common-workflow-language:master May 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants