Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow moderators to prioritize statements #133

Closed
colinmegill opened this issue Dec 31, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Allow moderators to prioritize statements #133

colinmegill opened this issue Dec 31, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@colinmegill
Copy link
Member

Allow moderators to create a 'tranche' of prioritized comments, to make part of the matrix more dense. This should be done transparently.

@patcon patcon transferred this issue from pol-is/polis-issues May 10, 2020
@crkrenn
Copy link
Contributor

crkrenn commented May 23, 2020 via email

@patcon patcon changed the title Prioritized comments Allow moderators to prioritize statements May 23, 2020
@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented May 23, 2020

I see this was closed by @colinmegill, and I'd originally thought it was bc it was a dup. But Chris's comment made me realize this is a separate feature request

Colin, to close this out with more context, can you share why moderator prioritization is off the feature list. Thanks!

@metasoarous
Copy link
Member

We probably closed this because this came in before we released comment routing (automatic comment prioritization).

It is slightly annoying that we use prioritization in two different senses here (what's important to participant vs what's important to facilitators to get feedback on).

@colinmegill
Copy link
Member Author

https://roamresearch.com/#/app/polis-methods/page/5PQ3RLtic

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented Jun 17, 2020

Thanks both!

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented Mar 13, 2021

cc @LawrenceFulton

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants