Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strand information for MoSEA not using SUPPA2 events #6

Open
JamalEH opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

strand information for MoSEA not using SUPPA2 events #6

JamalEH opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@JamalEH
Copy link

JamalEH commented Mar 25, 2020

Dear team,
May this email finds you all fine.

I have a question related to using MoSEA using coordinates from a tool different than SUPPA2.
my question is should I provide the strand information when extracting the sequences ? My bed file looks lik the following:
chr18 63127035 63128759 BCL2_E1
chr18 63123346 63127034 BCL2_E2
chr18 63126835 63127035 BCL2_U1
chr18 63126834 63127034 BCL2_U2

Providing the above file to I got the sequences. When I scan the sequences for the occurrence of the RBP binding motif i got something like:
#pattern name sequence name start stop strand score p-value q-value matched sequence
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E1 794 800 + 8.13415 0.000743 ACACAAT
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E1 1260 1266 + 10.0671 7.11e-05 ACACGAA
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E2 87 93 + 10.0549 0.000159 ACACAAA
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E2 1122 1128 + 9.96951 0.000413 ACACAAG
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E2 1426 1432 + 8.2378 0.000536 ACACCAC
HNRNPL_00091 BCL2_E2 1877 1883 + 7.56098 0.000996 ACACAGA

Looking at the strand column the tool reports a sequence on the positive strand, while my gene BCL2 is on the reverse strand "ensembl location: Chromosome 18: 63,123,346-63,320,128 reverse strand".
I'm using the hg38 genome assembly to extract sequences.

I will be very thankful if you can help me to fix this issue.
Thank you so much in advance!
Kind regards,
Jamal.

@EduEyras
Copy link
Member

EduEyras commented Mar 25, 2020 via email

@JamalEH
Copy link
Author

JamalEH commented Mar 25, 2020

Dear Eduardo,
Thank you so much for your prompt reply!

When including the strand information like this:
chr18 63127035 63128759 - BCL2_E1
chr18 63123346 63127034 - BCL2_E2
chr18 63126835 63127035 - BCL2_U1
chr18 63126834 63127034 - BCL2_U2

The tool when reporting the sequence considers the strand column as the name of the corrdinates, I reports something like:

TATCAACCACAGCATTAAACATTGAACAGAGTACATTCCAAAGTTAATACAGATAAATGGTATATAATGCAATAATGCCACAGAGTTATTCCATCAATGTTTCAAGGCTGATTCTAAACTGGAAGAAAAAAAAATTTCCTAGTTTATTTGCTGAAGATGTCACTTCTTTTGTTACTTCTTTATAGTTCCCCACCATTGAT

ATATCAACCACAGCATTAAACATTGAACAGAGTACATTCCAAAGTTAATACAGATAAATGGTATATAATGCAATAATGCCACAGAGTTATTCCATCAATGTTTCAAGGCTGATTCTAAACTGGAAGAAAAAAAAATTTCCTAGTTTATTTGCTGAAGATGTCACTTCTTTTGTTACTTCTTTATAGTTCCCCACCATTGA

Should I add a header and then adjust the getfasta command to force it consider the header of the file? or the column with strand information should be added in a different place?

getfasta command is run with -s option which reverse complement the sequence if located on negative strand.

Thank you again!
Kind regards,
Jamal.

@JamalEH
Copy link
Author

JamalEH commented Mar 25, 2020

dots are just negative sign "-". They changed after sending the message. Sorry for that

@EduEyras
Copy link
Member

EduEyras commented Mar 25, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants