Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support header-only option #470

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2020

Conversation

uilianries
Copy link
Member

@uilianries uilianries commented Feb 28, 2020

Changelog: Feature: Manages header_only option in recipes (#454)

closes #454

  • Refer to the issue that supports this Pull Request.
  • If the issue has missing info, explain the purpose/use case/pain/need that covers this Pull Request.
  • I've read the Contributing guide.
  • I've followed the PEP8 style guides for Python code.

Signed-off-by: Uilian Ries <uilianries@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uilian Ries <uilianries@gmail.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #470 into develop will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #470      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    92.69%   92.76%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files           34       34              
  Lines         3368     3401      +33     
===========================================
+ Hits          3122     3155      +33     
  Misses         246      246
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cpt/packager.py 85.86% <100%> (+0.44%) ⬆️
cpt/test/integration/basic_test.py 96.89% <100%> (+0.41%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c816469...202b23a. Read the comment docs.

@uilianries uilianries merged commit 04b2c8e into conan-io:develop Feb 28, 2020
@uilianries uilianries deleted the feature/header-only-option branch February 28, 2020 18:40
@Croydon
Copy link
Contributor

Croydon commented Feb 28, 2020

Thank you! 🎉

@uilianries
Copy link
Member Author

We should release a new version on the next week. I gonna include other features too. But yeah, header-only definitively is a good one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for the "header_only" option
3 participants