Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add
conan.tools.android.android_abi()
#12873add
conan.tools.android.android_abi()
#12873Changes from all commits
624ef22
a4d59e6
7b8c368
d9a0003
57a86f5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the old code,
android_abi
would have been None for missing archs. The second parameter here changes that bahaviour, which might be more correct (No idea), but we should make sure it does not have any unintended side-effectsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well there are 2 old codes, inconsistent:
toos.to_android_abi()
=> it fallbacks tostr(conanfile.settings.arch)
So a decision has to be made for this new one, as you wish, I've not a strong opinion on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think falling back to the arch input instead of
None
might be better, for cases where the users extendsettings.yml
with their own architectures, if they map directly to android ones, then this will work. So I am fine with this as-is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is usually better to be done with a
@parametrized
decorator in the function itself, so failures are easier to debug, but I'm ok with this either way :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember to have written tests with @pytest.mark.parametrize, then move to this implementation but I don't remember why. I can change back to parametrize.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No big deal, if it works with parametrize easily, then do it, but don't waste time if you hit some issue.