Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pycuda to linux-aarch64 migration #1510

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dicta
Copy link
Contributor

@dicta dicta commented May 19, 2021

@dicta dicta requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2021 20:58
@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@isuruf
Copy link
Member

isuruf commented May 19, 2021

We don't build arm cuda packages yet. See conda-forge/cudatoolkit-feedstock#56

@isuruf isuruf closed this May 19, 2021
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Right though this is something we are looking to address

@dicta
Copy link
Contributor Author

dicta commented May 19, 2021

Sorry for the noise, then. I wasn't aware that this was hard blocked by something else.

Right though this is something we are looking to address

@jakirkham Is there anything where additonal help would get this unstuck, or is it waiting on something internal? Note that I'm specifically interested in the L4T case, which doesn't appear to be supported even if the linked PR in cudatoolkit-feedstock were to be merged. From the linked PR:

For Jetson/AGX builds that use conda it's recommended to use a selector and omit the CTK from recipes for now. This means users have to ensure they have the correct version of CUDA installed on their system and it doesn't allow for versioning but the currently JetPack for AGX/Jetson only supports CUDA 10.2.

The above language seems to indicate that downstream recipes could be migrated as long as they were only built against CUDA 10.2, i.e., for L4T. Are we just not there yet wrt infrastructure?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants