Add target libraries/executables to executable's RPATH

[billysuh7]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

conda-forge/cuda-feedstock#10

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[jakirkham]

Seeing the following warnings on CI

WARNING (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): $RPATH/libstdc++.so.6 not found in packages, sysroot(s) nor the missing_dso_whitelist.
.. is this binary repackaging?
   INFO (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): Needed DSO aarch64-conda-linux-gnu/sysroot/lib64/libm.so.6 found in CDT/compiler package conda-forge/noarch::sysroot_linux-aarch64==2.17=h5b4a56d_18
WARNING (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): $RPATH/libgcc_s.so.1 not found in packages, sysroot(s) nor the missing_dso_whitelist.
.. is this binary repackaging?

Both of those packages are there. So this suggests we might still be missing something with how the RPATH is set. So let's give this one another look

[billysuh7]

Seeing the following warnings on CI

WARNING (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): $RPATH/libstdc++.so.6 not found in packages, sysroot(s) nor the missing_dso_whitelist.
.. is this binary repackaging?
   INFO (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): Needed DSO aarch64-conda-linux-gnu/sysroot/lib64/libm.so.6 found in CDT/compiler package conda-forge/noarch::sysroot_linux-aarch64==2.17=h5b4a56d_18
WARNING (cuda-gdb,bin/cuda-gdb): $RPATH/libgcc_s.so.1 not found in packages, sysroot(s) nor the missing_dso_whitelist.
.. is this binary repackaging?

Both of those packages are there. So this suggests we might still be missing something with how the RPATH is set. So let's give this one another look

Pushed the fix. These missing DSO warnings are gone now after patching cuda-gdb file for aarch64. I was ignoring it because it was a shell script for linux-64, but didn't realize it is a binary executable for aarch64. Thanks.

[jakirkham]

Thanks for catching this Billy! 🙏

Just to clarify for anyone who reads this thread...

• cuda-gdb is a binary on linux-aarch64
• cuda-gdb is a shell script on linux-64

So we patch the former and skip the latter