Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update for cuBLASMp 0.3.0 #4

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Update for cuBLASMp 0.3.0 #4

merged 12 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

adibbley
Copy link
Contributor

@adibbley adibbley commented Nov 4, 2024

@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

adibbley commented Nov 4, 2024

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@adibbley adibbley mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
Closed
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

conda-forge-admin commented Feb 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). This parser is not currently used by conda-forge, but may be in the future. We are collecting information to see which recipes are compatible with grayskull.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/13793348015. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please restart ci

@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@mrogowski
Copy link

Is there a blocker for 0.3.0, 0.3.1, 0.4.0 (live today) releases of cuBLASMp?

I see the pipeline failed on

  - nothing provides __glibc >=2.28,<3.0.a0 needed by libnvshmem3-3.1.7-h1f6e3fe_0

@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@adibbley adibbley marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 16:05
@adibbley adibbley requested review from almogsegal, mrogowski and a team as code owners March 11, 2025 16:05
@adibbley adibbley added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Mar 11, 2025
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • azure: failed

Thus the PR was not passing and not merged.

@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@conda-forge-curator conda-forge-curator bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Mar 11, 2025
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

conda-forge-webservices[bot] and others added 2 commits March 11, 2025 16:25
@adibbley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@adibbley adibbley merged commit 5bbdd33 into conda-forge:main Mar 11, 2025
5 checks passed
jakirkham
jakirkham reviewed Mar 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
conda-forge.yml
Comment on lines -10 to -13
os_version:
linux_64: cos7
linux_aarch64: cos7
linux_ppc64le: cos7
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When dropping this, we need to run check-glibc in the package build

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed as issue: #7

@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jakirkham jakirkham jakirkham left review comments

@almogsegal almogsegal Awaiting requested review from almogsegal almogsegal is a code owner

@mrogowski mrogowski Awaiting requested review from mrogowski mrogowski is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@adibbley @conda-forge-admin @mrogowski @jakirkham